Suzuki Alto MOT Results

Registered in 1999
50.8% pass rate
from 126 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Alto is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Suspension
    • 14% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 14% fail on Component mounting (200% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 8.7% fail on Front drive shafts (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 8.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.6% fail on Rear
    • 0.79% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.79% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.79% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
    • 0.79% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 8.7% fail on Fog lamp (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Battery
    • 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Tell tales (92 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.79% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Front lamps
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 0.79% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.79% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.79% fail on Headlamp aim
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 11% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 9.5% fail on Rear wheels (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.0% fail on Components
        • 4.0% fail on Pipes
      • 0.79% fail on Leaks
    • 2.4% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.79% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.79% fail on Pedal
        • 0.79% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.79% fail on Hub components
      • 0.79% fail on Brake pads
  • 9.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Body condition
    • 3.2% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 3.2% fail on Chassis
    • 2.4% fail on Doors
      • 2.4% fail on Drivers (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Body security
    • 0.79% fail on Seats
      • 0.79% fail on Drivers
  • 7.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Condition
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.79% fail on Size/type
  • 7.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.6% fail on Emissions
    • 2.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.6% fail on Tank (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on System
    • 0.79% fail on Exhaust system
  • 7.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.79% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.79% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 6.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
  • 2.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.6% fail on Steering
    • 0.79% fail on Steering system
      • 0.79% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.79% fail on Steering operation

Search Good Garages