Subaru Tribeca MOT Results

Registered in 2008
64.0% pass rate
from 161 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Subaru Tribeca is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.62% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.62% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.62% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.62% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.62% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.62% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.62% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.62% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 5.0% fail on Springs
      • 5.0% fail on Coil springs
        • 5.0% fail on Coil spring
    • 3.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.62% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.62% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 8.1% fail on Brakes
    • 5.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 5.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 5.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.62% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.62% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.62% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.62% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.62% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.62% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.62% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.62% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.62% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt
          • 0.62% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.62% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt (sp)
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.3% fail on Visibility
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.62% fail on View to rear
      • 0.62% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.62% fail on Washers
  • 4.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.62% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.62% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.62% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.62% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages