Subaru Tribeca MOT Results

Registered in 2008

60.6% pass rate

from 142 tests in 2020

(10.0% better than other 2008 cars)

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Subaru Tribeca is unusually good or bad.

16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (17% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Stop lamp (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Headlamps (36% worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 4.9% fail on Headlamp (43% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (27% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (39% better than other 2008 cars)
  - 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (33% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Direction indicators (32% better than other 2008 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Flashing type (32% better than other 2008 cars)
    - 0.70% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.70% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
    - 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
11% fail on Suspension (27% better than other 2008 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Springs (21% worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 5.6% fail on Coil springs (22% worse than other 2008 cars)
    - 5.6% fail on Coil spring (23% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Suspension arms (24% better than other 2008 cars)
  - 3.5% fail on Pins and bushes (56% worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 0.70% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (65% better than other 2008 cars)
  - 0.70% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.70% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.70% fail on Shock absorbers
9.9% fail on Brakes (0.17% better than other 2008 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (63% worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 5.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
    - 4.9% fail on Brake pads (100% worse than other 2008 cars)
    - 0.70% fail on Brake linings
  - 0.70% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.70% fail on Brake discs
- 2.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (100% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Brake performance (43% better than other 2008 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (39% better than other 2008 cars)
    - 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (36% better than other 2008 cars)
  - 0.70% fail on Service brake performance
    - 0.70% fail on Rbt
      - 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.70% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.70% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.70% fail on Rbt
      - 0.70% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (80% worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 0.70% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 0.70% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.70% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.70% fail on Pedal
6.3% fail on Visibility (5.1% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Wipers (46% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Washers (51% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Bonnet
6.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (7.5% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Exhaust system (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
4.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (17% better than other 2008 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (12% better than other 2008 cars)
  - 4.2% fail on Spark ignition (29% worse than other 2008 cars)
    - 2.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (33% worse than other 2008 cars)
    - 1.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (9.9% better than other 2008 cars)
    - 0.70% fail on Emissions not tested
3.5% fail on Tyres (50% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth (49% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2008 cars)
0.70% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.70% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.70% fail on Requirements