Subaru Outback MOT Results
Registered in 200958.8% pass rate
from 444 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Subaru Outback is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
9.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes (27 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint
- 0.68% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.45% fail on Linkage
- 0.45% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
6.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.6% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.8% fail on Ball joint
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.23% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Springs
(80% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
(80% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Coil spring (80% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
(80% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.68% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.23% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.23% fail on Ball joint
- 0.23% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
9.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim (75% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp levelling device (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp
- 0.68% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (34 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.1% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.68% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.68% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.68% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.68% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.45% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.45% fail on Battery(ies)
-
5.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
9.2% fail on
Brakes
-
4.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.9% fail on Brake pads
-
2.0% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 2.0% fail on Brake discs
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 0.90% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.45% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.23% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.23% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
- 0.23% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.23% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.23% fail on
Rbt
- 0.23% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.23% fail on
Rbt
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake performance
- 1.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.6% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.6% fail on Electronic stability control (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.68% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.68% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.23% fail on Lever
- 0.23% fail on Electronic parking brake
-
0.23% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.23% fail on Operation
-
0.23% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.23% fail on Brake fluid
-
4.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
8.6% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(82% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Transmission
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Joints (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.23% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.23% fail on Joints
-
5.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.68% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.23% fail on Tank
- 0.23% fail on Hose
- 0.23% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.23% fail on
Doors
-
0.23% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.23% fail on Door condition
-
0.23% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
5.2% fail on
Transmission
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Visibility
- 3.2% fail on Washers
- 2.9% fail on Wipers
- 0.45% fail on Bonnet
-
5.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.7% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.68% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.45% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.23% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
2.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.45% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.45% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.7% fail on
Compression ignition
-
5.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.7% fail on
Tyres
(56% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Tread depth
- 0.90% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Size/type
-
0.90% fail on
Steering
-
0.45% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.45% fail on Track rod end
-
0.23% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.23% fail on Steering rack
-
0.23% fail on
Power steering
- 0.23% fail on Other components
-
0.45% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.23% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.23% fail on Registration plates
-
0.23% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.23% fail on Attachment