Subaru Outback MOT Results
Registered in 200555.6% pass rate
from 441 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Subaru Outback is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
7.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 7.3% fail on Headlamp
- 7.3% fail on Stop lamp (76% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.68% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.68% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.45% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.45% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.45% fail on Position lamp
-
0.23% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.23% fail on Horn
-
7.3% fail on
Headlamps
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
5.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.68% fail on Linkage
- 0.68% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.45% fail on Ball joint
- 0.45% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.23% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
5.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.5% fail on Ball joint
- 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 4.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.6% fail on
Sub-frames
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.91% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.68% fail on Ball joint
- 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.45% fail on
Springs
(90% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Coil springs
(90% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Coil spring (90% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Coil springs
(90% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.23% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.23% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
5.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
4.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
- 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(73% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Rbt (sp) (82% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.23% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
0.91% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.45% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.45% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.45% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (23 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.45% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.23% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.23% fail on
Rbt
- 0.23% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.23% fail on
Rbt
-
2.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.9% fail on Brake pads
-
0.91% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.91% fail on Brake discs
-
3.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.4% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.45% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.45% fail on Lever
-
0.45% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.45% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.23% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.23% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.23% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
4.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.3% fail on
Transmission
-
3.9% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.9% fail on Joints
-
0.45% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.45% fail on Joints
-
3.9% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.23% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.23% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
0.91% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.68% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.23% fail on Pipe
-
0.45% fail on
Chassis
- 0.45% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.45% fail on
Doors
-
0.45% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.45% fail on Door condition
-
0.45% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.23% fail on
Towbar
- 0.23% fail on Towbar condition
-
0.23% fail on
Load security
-
0.23% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.23% fail on Tailgate condition
-
0.23% fail on
Tailgate
-
4.3% fail on
Transmission
-
9.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
9.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
9.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(79% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 2.3% fail on Emissions not tested (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.45% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.23% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
9.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(79% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.45% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
9.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.7% fail on
Visibility
- 4.8% fail on Washers
- 2.9% fail on Wipers
- 0.23% fail on Bonnet
-
0.23% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.23% fail on Windscreen
-
4.5% fail on
Tyres
- 2.9% fail on Tread depth
- 1.6% fail on Condition
-
2.0% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.91% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(68% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.91% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.68% fail on Condition
- 0.23% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.91% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.45% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.45% fail on Attachment
-
0.23% fail on
Steering
-
0.23% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.23% fail on Track rod end
-
0.23% fail on
Steering linkage components