Subaru Legacy MOT Results

Registered in 2010
75.0% pass rate
from 563 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Subaru Legacy is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.9% fail on Position lamps (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Front lamps (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Rear lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Headlamp levelling device (77 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Headlamp levelling device (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Headlamp (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.71% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.71% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.18% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.18% fail on Fog lamp
  • 8.0% fail on Tyres
    • 5.5% fail on Condition (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
  • 5.9% fail on Brakes
    • 2.8% fail on Hub components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.36% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.18% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.8% fail on Electronic stability system (23 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.71% fail on Brake performance not tested (23 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Electronic parking brake (35 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.89% fail on Components
        • 0.89% fail on Pipes
        • 0.18% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
    • 0.18% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal
        • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on ABS
  • 3.2% fail on Suspension (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.71% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.53% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.36% fail on Coil springs (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Condition (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.18% fail on Front
      • 0.18% fail on Rear
    • 0.36% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.36% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.36% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.18% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 2.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.18% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.89% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.53% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.53% fail on Emissions
  • 0.71% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.71% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.36% fail on Steering
    • 0.36% fail on Steering system
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment
  • 0.18% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.18% fail on Seats
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages