Subaru Impreza MOT Results
Registered in 201079.1% pass rate
from 884 tests in 2017
(28% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Subaru Impreza is unusually good or bad.
-
8.0% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(40% better than other 2010 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.2% fail on Front lamps
- 0.11% fail on Rear lamps
- 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (61% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Headlamps
(65% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
(8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Headlamp (90% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
(8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.34% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.34% fail on Stop lamp (86% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.11% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.11% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.11% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.11% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.11% fail on Horn
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.3% fail on
Position lamps
-
6.2% fail on
Suspension
-
4.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(180% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Linkage condition (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.68% fail on
Coil springs
(79% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.45% fail on Rear
- 0.11% fail on Front
-
0.11% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.11% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.11% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
0.11% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.11% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.11% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.11% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
4.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(180% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Tyres
(41% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 1.8% fail on Tread depth (48% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Size/type
-
4.0% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(180% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Emissions (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.11% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.11% fail on Cap
-
3.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 1.7% fail on Wipers
- 0.90% fail on Washers
- 0.57% fail on Windscreen
- 0.11% fail on Bonnet
- 0.11% fail on Mirrors
-
3.2% fail on
Brakes
(43% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Hub components
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads
- 0.34% fail on Brake discs
-
0.90% fail on
Brake performance
(58% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Brake performance not tested (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Front wheels
- 0.23% fail on Brake operation (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.11% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.11% fail on
Components
- 0.11% fail on Pipes
-
0.11% fail on
Components
- 0.11% fail on ABS
- 0.11% fail on Restricted movement
-
2.0% fail on
Hub components
-
0.34% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.34% fail on Registration plate
-
0.23% fail on
Steering
-
0.23% fail on
Steering system
- 0.11% fail on Steering rack
- 0.11% fail on Track rod end
-
0.23% fail on
Steering system
-
0.23% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.23% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review