Subaru Impreza MOT Results

Registered in 2010
79.1% pass rate
from 884 tests in 2017
(28% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Subaru Impreza is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.0% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.11% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Headlamps (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.34% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.34% fail on Stop lamp (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.11% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.11% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.11% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.11% fail on Horn
    • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 6.2% fail on Suspension
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage condition (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.68% fail on Coil springs (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.45% fail on Rear
      • 0.11% fail on Front
    • 0.11% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.11% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.11% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.11% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres (41% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 4.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Emissions (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.11% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on Cap
  • 3.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 1.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.90% fail on Washers
    • 0.57% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.11% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.11% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.2% fail on Brakes (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.34% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.90% fail on Brake performance (58% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Brake performance not tested (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.23% fail on Brake operation (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.11% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Components
        • 0.11% fail on Pipes
    • 0.11% fail on ABS
    • 0.11% fail on Restricted movement
  • 0.34% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.34% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.23% fail on Steering
    • 0.23% fail on Steering system
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.11% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.23% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages