Subaru Impreza MOT Results
Registered in 200976.0% pass rate
from 912 tests in 2021
(40% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Subaru Impreza is unusually good or bad.
-
7.8% fail on
Suspension
(47% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.33% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.33% fail on Ball joint
- 0.22% fail on Linkage
- 0.22% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (83% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.4% fail on
Springs
(58% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Coil springs
(58% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Coil spring (58% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Mounting
-
2.4% fail on
Coil springs
(58% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(48% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.88% fail on Ball joint (60% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.44% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.22% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.11% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.11% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.11% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
-
2.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
7.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(70% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(77% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.77% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.33% fail on
Emission control equipment
(17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Catalytic converter (29 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.11% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
-
7.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.11% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
7.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(77% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(55% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp levelling device (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Headlamp (68% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.66% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.66% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.66% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.66% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.33% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.22% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.22% fail on Stop lamp (94% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.11% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.11% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.11% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.11% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
4.3% fail on
Brakes
(51% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
-
0.66% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.66% fail on Brake discs
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.6% fail on
Brake performance
(65% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Service brake performance
(55% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.99% fail on
Rbt
(59% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.11% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.99% fail on
Rbt
(59% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.22% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(89% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Service brake performance
(55% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.44% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.44% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.22% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.22% fail on Hand lever
-
0.22% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.22% fail on Lever
- 0.22% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.11% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.11% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.77% fail on
Transmission
(60% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.77% fail on Joints
-
0.77% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.22% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.22% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.22% fail on
Body
- 0.11% fail on Panel
- 0.11% fail on Other body component
-
0.11% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
3.2% fail on
Tyres
(49% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth
- 1.3% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Visibility
(52% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Washers (49% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Wipers (52% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Bonnet
-
0.66% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.66% fail on Registration plates
-
0.66% fail on
Steering
(72% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.33% fail on Steering rack
-
0.22% fail on
Steering linkage components
(88% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Locking devices
-
0.11% fail on
Power steering
- 0.11% fail on Operation
-
0.33% fail on
Steering gear
-
0.33% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.22% fail on Attachment
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
0.22% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(79% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
0.22% fail on
Seat belts
Read the Honest John Review