Subaru Impreza MOT Results
Registered in 200870.6% pass rate
from 1,353 tests in 2021
(30% better than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Subaru Impreza is unusually good or bad.
-
9.6% fail on
Suspension
(39% better than other 2008 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.30% fail on Ball joint
- 0.22% fail on Linkage
- 0.22% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (84% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(48% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.96% fail on Ball joint (53% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.074% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.4% fail on
Springs
(60% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Coil springs
(60% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Coil spring (60% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Coil springs
(60% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 0.59% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.44% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.22% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint
- 0.074% fail on Other suspension component
-
0.15% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.15% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.074% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.074% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
4.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
8.6% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(37% better than other 2008 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp levelling device (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp (57% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.81% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.37% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.30% fail on Horn
- 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.74% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.74% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.74% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.74% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.30% fail on
Direction indicators
(86% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Flashing type
(86% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Individual direction indicators (78% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.30% fail on
Flashing type
(86% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.074% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.074% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
8.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(52% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(58% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Spark ignition
(120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Emission control equipment
(21 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Catalytic converter (30 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.074% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.074% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.37% fail on
Compression ignition
(77% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.074% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.074% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.074% fail on Emissions not tested
-
8.0% fail on
Spark ignition
(120% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.15% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
8.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(58% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Brakes
(40% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Brake performance
(57% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake performance
(48% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
(47% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (46% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.074% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.074% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
(47% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(77% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Rbt (sp) (82% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.22% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.22% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.22% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.074% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.22% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.22% fail on
Parking brake performance
(80% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Rbt
(86% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance (84% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.074% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.074% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.15% fail on
Rbt
(86% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake performance
(48% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
-
0.81% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.81% fail on Brake discs
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.67% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.52% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.15% fail on Anti-lock braking system (80% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Rigid brake pipes (59% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.52% fail on Lever
-
0.30% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.15% fail on Pedal
- 0.15% fail on Hand lever
- 0.30% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.22% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.074% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.074% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
2.3% fail on
Brake performance
(57% better than other 2008 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.4% fail on
Transmission
(49% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(46% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Joints (46% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(46% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.15% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.074% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.074% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.074% fail on Bumpers
-
0.074% fail on
Doors
-
0.074% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.074% fail on Door condition
-
0.074% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.074% fail on
Seats
- 0.074% fail on Driver's seat
-
4.1% fail on
Visibility
(34% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Washers
- 2.0% fail on Wipers
- 0.15% fail on Bonnet
-
0.15% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.15% fail on Windscreen
-
3.0% fail on
Tyres
(55% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Condition (46% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth (64% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Size/type
-
1.2% fail on
Steering
(56% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Steering linkage components
(78% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint
- 0.15% fail on Track rod end (92% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Drag link end
-
0.074% fail on
Other components
- 0.074% fail on Steering linkage
-
0.37% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.37% fail on Steering rack
-
0.37% fail on
Power steering
- 0.37% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Steering linkage components
(78% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(62% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.15% fail on Requirements
- 0.074% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.074% fail on Condition
- 0.22% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.15% fail on
Airbags
- 0.15% fail on Drivers airbag (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.37% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.37% fail on Registration plates
-
0.30% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.30% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review