Subaru Impreza MOT Results
Registered in 199666.9% pass rate
from 577 tests in 2017
(24% better than other 1996 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Subaru Impreza is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.6% fail on Headlamp aim
-
5.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(90% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Fog lamp (92% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Tell tale
- 0.17% fail on Switch
-
4.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.3% fail on Front lamps
- 0.35% fail on Rear lamps (80% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.17% fail on All position lamps
- 4.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp
-
0.35% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.17% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.17% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
2.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.69% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.52% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Battery
- 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (68% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Horn
- 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
13% fail on
Suspension
(29% better than other 1996 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 4.7% fail on Component mounting
- 0.52% fail on Spring mounting
- 0.17% fail on Subframe mounting
-
4.9% fail on
Drive shafts
-
4.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 4.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
- 0.17% fail on Couplings
-
4.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
2.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.52% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.0% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.69% fail on Front
- 0.35% fail on Rear
- 0.87% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.87% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.87% fail on Condition
-
0.52% fail on
Suspension arms
(83% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (82% better than other 1996 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.17% fail on Condition
-
0.17% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.17% fail on Condition
-
0.17% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.17% fail on Condition
-
5.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
12% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 8.7% fail on Emissions
- 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.87% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.35% fail on Cap
- 0.17% fail on Tank
- 0.17% fail on Pipe
- 0.17% fail on System
-
9.7% fail on
Brakes
(38% better than other 1996 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Brake performance
(52% better than other 1996 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Front wheels (55% better than other 1996 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Rear wheels (65% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Parking brake performance (76% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.17% fail on Brake imbalance
-
3.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(43% better than other 1996 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Components
(47% better than other 1996 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Pipes
- 0.69% fail on Hoses
- 0.69% fail on Leaks
- 0.17% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
2.9% fail on
Components
(47% better than other 1996 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Hub components
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
- 0.17% fail on Brake calipers
- 1.4% fail on ABS
-
0.87% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.87% fail on
Pedal
- 0.69% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.87% fail on
Pedal
- 0.35% fail on Restricted movement
-
4.2% fail on
Brake performance
(52% better than other 1996 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(34% better than other 1996 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Washers
- 1.9% fail on Wipers (62% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Windscreen
- 0.52% fail on Mirrors
-
4.5% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
- 2.1% fail on Condition
-
4.0% fail on
Steering
-
3.5% fail on
Steering system
- 3.3% fail on Steering rack (150% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint
- 0.17% fail on Steering arm
-
0.17% fail on
Steering control
-
0.17% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.17% fail on Universal joint
-
0.17% fail on
Steering coupling
-
0.17% fail on
Power steering
- 0.17% fail on Operation
- 0.17% fail on Other components
- 0.17% fail on Locking devices
-
3.5% fail on
Steering system
-
2.6% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(53% better than other 1996 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Body condition
-
0.69% fail on
Seats
- 0.52% fail on Passengers
- 0.35% fail on Drivers
-
0.35% fail on
Vehicle structure
(79% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Chassis (79% better than other 1996 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Doors
- 0.17% fail on Passengers front
-
2.1% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(63% better than other 1996 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts
(64% better than other 1996 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas (67% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
-
0.35% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.35% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts
(64% better than other 1996 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.6% fail on Registration plate
-
0.17% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.17% fail on Attachment