Subaru Impreza MOT Results
Registered in 199565.2% pass rate
from 558 tests in 2017
(18% better than other 1995 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Subaru Impreza is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim
-
6.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(95% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Fog lamp (98% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Tell tale
- 0.36% fail on Switch
- 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
4.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.4% fail on Front lamps
- 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.36% fail on All position lamps
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp
- 0.18% fail on Dipswitch
- 3.0% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Battery
-
2.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.54% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.18% fail on Tell tales
-
2.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.8% fail on Stop lamp (55% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.36% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.18% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.18% fail on Switch
- 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
13% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 9.7% fail on Emissions (65% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.36% fail on Pipe
- 0.36% fail on System
- 0.18% fail on Tank
- 0.18% fail on Hose
-
12% fail on
Brakes
-
6.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
5.6% fail on
Components
- 3.0% fail on Pipes
- 2.3% fail on Hoses
- 0.36% fail on Cylinders (10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Operation
- 0.36% fail on Leaks
- 0.18% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
5.6% fail on
Components
-
4.7% fail on
Brake performance
(43% better than other 1995 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Front wheels
- 1.8% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (62% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.36% fail on Service brake performance (79% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Brake operation
- 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.6% fail on
Hub components
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
- 0.54% fail on Brake discs
-
0.72% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.72% fail on
Pedal
- 0.54% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.18% fail on Condition
-
0.72% fail on
Pedal
- 0.72% fail on ABS
-
0.54% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.54% fail on Condition
- 0.36% fail on Restricted movement
-
6.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
11% fail on
Suspension
(34% better than other 1995 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 3.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.72% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Drive shafts (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
3.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.54% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.36% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.18% fail on Condition
-
3.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
(52% better than other 1995 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Component mounting (47% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.18% fail on Spring mounting
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(61% better than other 1995 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.90% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.90% fail on Condition
-
0.72% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.54% fail on Front
- 0.18% fail on Rear
-
0.36% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.36% fail on Condition
-
0.18% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.18% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.18% fail on Condition
- 0.18% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
3.8% fail on
Drive shafts
-
7.9% fail on
Steering
(63% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Steering system
(79% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Free play
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Steering rack (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Track rod end (79% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
-
0.54% fail on
Power steering
- 0.18% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.18% fail on Rams
- 0.18% fail on Other components
-
0.18% fail on
Steering control
- 0.18% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.18% fail on Locking devices
-
7.0% fail on
Steering system
(79% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.5% fail on Washers
- 2.7% fail on Wipers
- 0.72% fail on Windscreen
-
5.9% fail on
Tyres
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 0.36% fail on Size/type
-
3.4% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 1.8% fail on Body condition
-
0.90% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.90% fail on Chassis
- 0.36% fail on Speedometer
- 0.18% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.18% fail on
Doors
- 0.18% fail on Passengers other
-
2.3% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.3% fail on Registration plate
-
1.8% fail on
Road Wheels
(4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(68% better than other 1995 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts
(68% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Condition
- 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas (86% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.18% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts
(68% better than other 1995 cars)