Subaru Impreza MOT Results
Registered in 199463.2% pass rate
from 57 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Subaru Impreza is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
11% fail on
Electrical equipment
(6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Horn (8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Electrical wiring
- 1.8% fail on Battery(ies)
- 7.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
5.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
5.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 5.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
5.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp
- 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
11% fail on
Electrical equipment
(6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
12% fail on
Suspension
- 8.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.8% fail on Ball joint
- 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
3.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.8% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
7.0% fail on
Transmission
-
7.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 7.0% fail on Joints
-
7.0% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.5% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
3.5% fail on
Seats
(5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Driver's seat (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Passenger's seat
- 1.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.8% fail on Bumpers
-
1.8% fail on
Doors
-
1.8% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 1.8% fail on Door condition
-
1.8% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
7.0% fail on
Transmission
-
12% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
- 7.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 3.5% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.8% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 1.8% fail on Catalytic converter
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
-
1.8% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.8% fail on Other leaks
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.8% fail on
Brakes
-
8.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.5% fail on
Rbt
- 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Decelerometer
- 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.5% fail on
Rbt
-
3.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.8% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.8% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.3% fail on
Service brake performance
- 1.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.8% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.8% fail on Brake discs
-
1.8% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
8.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.8% fail on
Steering
-
7.0% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Operation
-
1.8% fail on
Power steering
- 1.8% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
7.0% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Tyres
- 3.5% fail on Condition
- 1.8% fail on Tread depth
-
3.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.5% fail on Requirements (47 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.8% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.8% fail on Registration plates
-
1.8% fail on
Visibility
- 1.8% fail on Washers