Subaru Forester MOT Results
Registered in 201685.1% pass rate
from 1,278 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Subaru Forester is unusually good or bad.
-
4.5% fail on
Visibility
- 4.0% fail on Wipers
- 0.63% fail on Washers
-
0.078% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.078% fail on Windscreen
-
4.1% fail on
Suspension
(99% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.078% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.3% fail on
Springs
-
1.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.3% fail on Coil spring
-
1.3% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.23% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.078% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.078% fail on Ball joint
- 0.078% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.16% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.16% fail on
Other suspension component
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Ball joint (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.078% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.078% fail on Macpherson strut
-
2.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.94% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.63% fail on Headlamp
- 0.31% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.55% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.47% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.47% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.47% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.47% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.47% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.078% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.078% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.078% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.078% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.078% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.078% fail on Electrical wiring
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
2.3% fail on
Brakes
-
1.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
-
0.16% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.16% fail on Brake discs
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.47% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Electronic stability control (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.31% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.23% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.23% fail on
Rbt
- 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.078% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.23% fail on
Rbt
-
0.078% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.078% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.23% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.078% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.078% fail on Pedal
- 0.078% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
1.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.6% fail on
Tyres
(60% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Condition
- 0.16% fail on Tread depth (92% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Size/type
-
0.70% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 0.31% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.23% fail on
Transmission
-
0.23% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.23% fail on Joints
-
0.23% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.078% fail on Bumpers
-
0.078% fail on
Towbar
- 0.078% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.55% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.55% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.31% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.31% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.23% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.078% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.078% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.078% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.078% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.078% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.078% fail on
Emission control equipment
-
0.31% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.55% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.23% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.078% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.078% fail on Condition
-
0.078% fail on
Airbags
- 0.078% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.078% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.078% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.16% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.16% fail on Registration plates
-
0.16% fail on
Steering
-
0.078% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.078% fail on Steering rack
-
0.078% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.078% fail on Ball joint
-
0.078% fail on
Steering gear
-
0.078% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.078% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Subaru Forester (2013 - 2019)
Well-equipped as standard. Spacious interior. Impressive roadholding even in poor weather.