Subaru Forester MOT Results
Registered in 201168.9% pass rate
from 976 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Subaru Forester is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(49% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Headlamps
(63% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp levelling device (12 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.31% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(170% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(170% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(170% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Direction indicators
(65% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Flashing type
(65% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.61% fail on
Flashing type
(65% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.10% fail on Position lamp
- 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.10% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.10% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
9.0% fail on
Suspension
-
4.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.5% fail on Ball joint
- 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.61% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.10% fail on Suspension arm
-
4.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(74% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes (40 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.41% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Linkage
- 0.31% fail on Ball joint
- 0.10% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.10% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.72% fail on
Other suspension component
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Other suspension component (21 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.10% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.10% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.10% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.10% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.10% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.10% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
4.7% fail on
Suspension arms
-
7.7% fail on
Brakes
-
4.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.0% fail on Brake pads
-
1.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.4% fail on Brake discs
- 0.10% fail on Brake drums
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.10% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
-
0.41% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(70% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Rbt (sp) (76% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
0.31% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.20% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.10% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.20% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.10% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.10% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.10% fail on
Rbt
- 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.10% fail on
Rbt
-
1.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Electronic stability control (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.72% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.20% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.20% fail on Hand lever
- 0.20% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.10% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.10% fail on Reservoirs
-
4.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
4.3% fail on
Visibility
- 2.3% fail on Wipers
- 2.2% fail on Washers
- 0.10% fail on Driver's view
-
0.10% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.10% fail on Windscreen
-
4.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(72% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(83% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Compression ignition
(190% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.8% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.92% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.82% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.5% fail on
Compression ignition
(190% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.10% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
4.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(83% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Tyres
(60% better than other 2011 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Condition
- 0.92% fail on Tread depth (72% better than other 2011 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 1.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.92% fail on
Transmission
-
0.92% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.92% fail on Joints
-
0.92% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.10% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.10% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.10% fail on Bumpers
-
0.41% fail on
Steering
(78% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Steering linkage components
(80% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Track rod end (79% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.10% fail on Steering rack
-
0.31% fail on
Steering linkage components
(80% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.10% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Subaru Forester (2008 - 2013)
Good compromise between a station wagon and an SUV. Now available with 2.0 litre chain cam 'boxer' diesel engine.