Subaru Forester MOT Results
Registered in 200056.0% pass rate
from 273 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Subaru Forester is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Suspension
-
8.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(120% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.37% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 7.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.7% fail on
Sub-frames
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Sub-frame (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.73% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.37% fail on Suspension arm
- 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.5% fail on
Springs
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.1% fail on Coil spring
- 0.37% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
-
1.5% fail on
Other suspension component
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Other suspension component
-
0.73% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.37% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.37% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.37% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes
-
8.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(120% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
18% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp
-
3.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(170% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(170% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(170% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.5% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.37% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.73% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.73% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.73% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.73% fail on
Flashing type
-
14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 7.0% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Transmission
-
4.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.0% fail on Joints
-
4.0% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.8% fail on
Chassis
- 1.8% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.8% fail on
Fuel system
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Pipe
- 0.37% fail on System
-
0.73% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.73% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.37% fail on Bumpers
-
0.37% fail on
Towbar
- 0.37% fail on Towbar condition
-
0.37% fail on
Body
- 0.37% fail on Other body component
-
13% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(54% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
(62% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 9.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (71% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.73% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.37% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.37% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.37% fail on Catalytic converter
-
0.37% fail on
Emission control equipment
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
(62% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.37% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.37% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.37% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.37% fail on Other leaks
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
5.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
- 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.73% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.37% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.37% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
-
2.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.73% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.73% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.73% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.37% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.73% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
- 0.73% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.37% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
-
3.3% fail on
Service brake performance
- 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.2% fail on Brake pads
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.73% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.73% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.37% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.37% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.37% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.37% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
5.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.7% fail on
Visibility
- 3.3% fail on Wipers
- 3.3% fail on Washers
- 0.73% fail on Bonnet
-
0.37% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.37% fail on Windscreen
-
5.1% fail on
Steering
-
4.8% fail on
Steering gear
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.37% fail on Ball joint
-
0.37% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.37% fail on Universal joint
-
4.8% fail on
Steering gear
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Tyres
- 1.8% fail on Tread depth
- 1.5% fail on Condition
- 0.73% fail on Size/type
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.37% fail on Condition
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.73% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.73% fail on Registration plates