SsangYong Tivoli MOT Results

Registered in 2016
82.7% pass rate
from 2,078 tests in 2020
(30% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Tivoli is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.7% fail on Brakes (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Brake pads (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.048% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.1% fail on Brake performance (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.34% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.096% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.096% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.048% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.096% fail on Lever
    • 0.048% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.048% fail on Hand lever
  • 4.6% fail on Tyres (31% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Condition (89% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.048% fail on Size/type
  • 4.3% fail on Visibility (52% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers (77% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Washers
    • 0.096% fail on View to rear
      • 0.096% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.048% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.048% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.048% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.72% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.72% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.14% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.048% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.048% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.048% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.048% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 0.82% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Exhaust emissions (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.096% fail on Emissions not tested (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.048% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.38% fail on Suspension
    • 0.14% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.096% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.048% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.048% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.096% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.096% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.048% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 0.29% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.29% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.19% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.19% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.096% fail on Condition
    • 0.096% fail on Attachment
  • 0.048% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.048% fail on Body
      • 0.048% fail on Other body component
Read the Honest John Review

  • SsangYong Tivoli XLV (2016 on)
    Exceptional value for money given the spec and space, cavernous boot and space for five people, backed by a seven-year warranty.
  • SsangYong Tivoli (2015 on)
    Well equipped and seriously well priced. Hard to fault the build quality when you consider the price. Diesel is affordable to run.

    Search Good Garages