MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » SsangYong » Tivoli » 2016

SsangYong Tivoli MOT Results

Registered in 2016
77.1% pass rate
from 2,088 tests in 2021
(41% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Tivoli is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps (92% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.34% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.29% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.048% fail on Switch
    • 0.19% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.19% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.14% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.048% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.14% fail on Stop lamp (77% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.048% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.048% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.048% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.048% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.048% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.048% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 6.6% fail on Brakes (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Brake pads (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.62% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.14% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.096% fail on Lever (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.048% fail on Pivot
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.096% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.048% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 0.77% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.77% fail on Rbt
          • 0.77% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.048% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.48% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.048% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.048% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.096% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.096% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.096% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.048% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.048% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.29% fail on Rigid brake pipes (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.14% fail on Lever
    • 0.14% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.14% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.096% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.096% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.096% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.048% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.048% fail on Hand lever
  • 5.5% fail on Tyres (41% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Condition (77% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.048% fail on Size/type
  • 5.4% fail on Visibility (37% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.86% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.81% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.43% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.38% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.096% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 0.38% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.38% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.048% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.048% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.048% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.62% fail on Suspension (70% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.048% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.048% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.19% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.048% fail on Springs
      • 0.048% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.048% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.048% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.048% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 0.34% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.24% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Other passenger's door (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Front passenger's door (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.096% fail on Door condition (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.048% fail on Bumpers
  • 0.19% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.19% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.14% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.096% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.096% fail on Condition
    • 0.048% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment
  • 0.048% fail on Steering
    • 0.048% fail on Electronic power steering
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages