SsangYong Tivoli MOT Results
Registered in 201677.1% pass rate
from 2,088 tests in 2021
(41% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Tivoli is unusually good or bad.
-
7.3% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(110% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamps
(92% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.34% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.29% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.048% fail on Switch
-
0.34% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.19% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.19% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.14% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.048% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.19% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.14% fail on Stop lamp (77% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.096% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.048% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.048% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.048% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.048% fail on Position lamp
-
0.048% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.048% fail on Reversing lamps
-
6.6% fail on
Brakes
(140% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(140% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Brake pads (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.62% fail on Brake discs
-
0.14% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Lever (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Pivot
-
3.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(140% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
0.77% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.77% fail on
Rbt
- 0.77% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.77% fail on
Rbt
-
0.48% fail on
Parking brake performance
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.048% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.048% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.43% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.096% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.096% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.048% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.048% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.096% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Rigid brake pipes (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.14% fail on Lever
-
0.14% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.14% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.096% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.096% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.096% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.048% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.048% fail on Hand lever
-
4.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Tyres
(41% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Condition (77% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Tread depth
- 0.048% fail on Size/type
-
5.4% fail on
Visibility
(37% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Wipers
- 2.6% fail on Washers (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.81% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.43% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.38% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.096% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
0.38% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.38% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.048% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.43% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.048% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.048% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.81% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.62% fail on
Suspension
(70% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.24% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.048% fail on Ball joint
- 0.048% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.19% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.048% fail on
Springs
-
0.048% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.048% fail on Coil spring
-
0.048% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.048% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.048% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.34% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
0.34% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
0.24% fail on
Doors
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Other passenger's door
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Door condition (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.096% fail on
Front passenger's door
(8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Door condition (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Other passenger's door
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.048% fail on Bumpers
-
0.24% fail on
Doors
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.19% fail on Registration plates
-
0.14% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.096% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.096% fail on Condition
- 0.048% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.096% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.14% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.14% fail on Attachment
-
0.048% fail on
Steering
- 0.048% fail on Electronic power steering
Read the Honest John Review
-
SsangYong Tivoli (2015 - 2024)
Well equipped and seriously well priced. Hard to fault the build quality when you consider the price.