MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » SsangYong » Rodius » 2016

SsangYong Rodius MOT Results

Registered in 2016
67.7% pass rate
from 626 tests in 2021
(100% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Rodius is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (18 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (18 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (18 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.80% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.80% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.96% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.80% fail on Individual direction indicators (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.64% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (136 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (159 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 9.1% fail on Brakes (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Brake performance (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (51 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.80% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Rbt (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.80% fail on Parking brake performance (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.16% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.16% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.32% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.32% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.16% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.16% fail on Pivot
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake control (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Lever (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (41 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Hand lever (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.16% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.16% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.16% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.16% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 7.3% fail on Suspension (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Springs (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Coil springs (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 5.9% fail on Coil spring (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.64% fail on Ball joint dust cover (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.16% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 5.8% fail on Visibility
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.6% fail on Steering (16 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Steering linkage components (20 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Track rod end (21 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (28 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 1.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.4% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.80% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.48% fail on Spare wheel (353 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Spare wheel condition (370 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Carrier
    • 0.32% fail on Body (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Panel
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
  • 0.64% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.64% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.32% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.32% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages