SsangYong Rodius MOT Results
Registered in 201559.4% pass rate
from 414 tests in 2021
(110% worse than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Rodius is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Headlamps
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Headlamp (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(16 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(16 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (17 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(16 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.97% fail on Individual direction indicators (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.48% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.48% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(47 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (52 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.24% fail on Position lamp
-
0.24% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.24% fail on Switch
-
4.6% fail on
Headlamps
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(180% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
- 0.24% fail on Brake drums
-
5.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake performance
(11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
(9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance (11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
(9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 0.97% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.24% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
-
0.48% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.48% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (42 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake control
(11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Lever (12 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.24% fail on Pedal
-
0.24% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.24% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
- 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
6.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(180% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
10% fail on
Suspension
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Springs
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Coil spring (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (27 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.48% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.24% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.24% fail on Linkage
-
0.24% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint
-
6.8% fail on
Springs
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Visibility
(67% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Wipers (100% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Washers
-
0.48% fail on
Condition of glass
(7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Windscreen (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Tyres
- 3.4% fail on Tread depth
- 2.9% fail on Condition
- 0.24% fail on Size/type
-
3.4% fail on
Steering
(7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
(9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Track rod end (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
(9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts
(5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.72% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts
(5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Registration plates (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.48% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.48% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.24% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.48% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.24% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.24% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
0.48% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.72% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.72% fail on Attachment
-
0.24% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 0.24% fail on Bumpers