SsangYong Rodius MOT Results

Registered in 2009
52.7% pass rate
from 131 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Rodius is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (64% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 9.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Switch (587 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Headlamp aim (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Headlamp aim (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.76% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.76% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.76% fail on Position lamp
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 7.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.76% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 4.6% fail on Sub-frames (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (71 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.76% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.76% fail on Linkage
      • 0.76% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.76% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 1.5% fail on Springs
      • 1.5% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (51 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Axles
      • 0.76% fail on Axle
    • 0.76% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint
  • 15% fail on Brakes (75% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.76% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.76% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.76% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.8% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.76% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.76% fail on Lever
    • 0.76% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.76% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.76% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.76% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 15% fail on Steering (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 12% fail on Steering linkage components (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 12% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering play (26 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack (26 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.76% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.76% fail on Power steering
      • 0.76% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 9.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust system (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (20 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (25 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Chassis (50 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Chassis condition (51 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.6% fail on Visibility
    • 2.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
  • 3.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.3% fail on Emissions not tested (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.76% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.76% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
  • 1.5% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.5% fail on Attachment
  • 0.76% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.76% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.76% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.76% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.76% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.76% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.76% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • SsangYong Rodius (2005 - 2013)
    Curious but commodious seven-seater with an enormous luggage area, reasonable enough to drive, cheap to buy with 250,000 mile taxi warranty.

    Search Good Garages