SsangYong Rodius MOT Results

Registered in 2006
43.0% pass rate
from 193 tests in 2017
(35% worse than other 2006 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Rodius is unusually good or bad.

  • 40% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (84% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 16% fail on Registration plate lamp (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (14 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 13% fail on Fog lamp (15 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Tell tale (94 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Switch (58 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 11% fail on Headlamp aim (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 11% fail on Position lamps (85% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 11% fail on Front lamps (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.1% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Rear reflectors (26 times worse than other 2006 cars)
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 9.8% fail on Suspension arms (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Condition (21 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Coil springs
      • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 4.1% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Component mounting (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Subframe mounting (14 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Spring mounting
    • 3.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.52% fail on Condition
      • 0.52% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.52% fail on Linkage condition
    • 3.1% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.52% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.52% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.52% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.52% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 19% fail on Brakes (68% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 9.3% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.52% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.52% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.52% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.1% fail on Components
        • 4.1% fail on Pipes
      • 1.0% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (12 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Operation
    • 4.1% fail on Hub components
      • 3.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.52% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.52% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.52% fail on ABS
  • 14% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 13% fail on Steering system (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 10% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.52% fail on Free play
        • 0.52% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.52% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.52% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.6% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pipes and hoses (15 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Other components
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.8% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.52% fail on Bonnet
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 6.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.52% fail on Size/type
  • 6.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.52% fail on System
    • 0.52% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.0% fail on Doors
      • 0.52% fail on Drivers
      • 0.52% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.52% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.52% fail on Chassis
    • 0.52% fail on Body condition
    • 0.52% fail on Seats
      • 0.52% fail on Passengers
  • 2.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.52% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.52% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • SsangYong Rodius (2005 - 2013)
    Curious but commodious seven-seater with an enormous luggage area, reasonable enough to drive, cheap to buy with 250,000 mile taxi warranty.

    Search Good Garages