SsangYong Rodius MOT Results
Registered in 200525.0% pass rate
from 32 tests in 2021
(76% worse than other 2005 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Rodius is unusually good or bad.
-
31% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
13% fail on
Headlamps
- 13% fail on Headlamp
- 9.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
6.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
6.3% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
3.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.1% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.1% fail on Rear reflectors
-
13% fail on
Headlamps
-
25% fail on
Steering
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
22% fail on
Steering linkage components
(6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 22% fail on Track rod end (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Power steering
- 3.1% fail on Operation
- 3.1% fail on Other components
-
3.1% fail on
Steering play
- 3.1% fail on Steering rack
-
22% fail on
Steering linkage components
(6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
25% fail on
Suspension
-
9.4% fail on
Springs
- 6.3% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (158 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.1% fail on Mounting
-
6.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.1% fail on Suspension arm
- 3.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
6.3% fail on
Sub-frames
(11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Pins and bushes
- 3.1% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 6.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 3.1% fail on Shock absorbers
-
9.4% fail on
Springs
-
22% fail on
Brakes
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 13% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
13% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
3.1% fail on
Parking brake control
- 3.1% fail on Lever
-
3.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 3.1% fail on Brake discs
-
3.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
3.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 3.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 3.1% fail on Electronic stability control
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Visibility
- 9.4% fail on Washers
- 6.3% fail on Wipers
-
13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
3.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
3.1% fail on
Chassis
- 3.1% fail on Chassis condition
- 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.1% fail on
Body
- 3.1% fail on Panel
-
3.1% fail on
Cabs
- 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
-
3.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
13% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
13% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
9.4% fail on
Compression ignition
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 3.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 3.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
6.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 6.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
9.4% fail on
Compression ignition
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
13% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
9.4% fail on
Tyres
- 6.3% fail on Condition
- 3.1% fail on Tread depth
-
6.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
6.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 6.3% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.1% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 3.1% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
SsangYong Rodius (2005 - 2013)
Curious but commodious seven-seater with an enormous luggage area, reasonable enough to drive, cheap to buy with 250,000 mile taxi warranty.