SsangYong Rexton MOT Results
Registered in 201774.9% pass rate
from 470 tests in 2021
(100% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Rexton is unusually good or bad.
-
8.9% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (16 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamps
(4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(12 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(12 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (12 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(12 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.21% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.21% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.21% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.21% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.21% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.21% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.21% fail on Horn
-
8.5% fail on
Suspension
(8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Springs
(17 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Coil springs
(17 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Coil spring (17 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Coil springs
(17 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (50 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint
-
1.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (16 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Springs
(17 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Brakes
(190% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(160% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(170% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Brake pads (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.43% fail on Brake discs
-
0.21% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.21% fail on Linkage
-
3.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(170% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Brake performance
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.85% fail on
Parking brake performance
(17 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Rbt
(18 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Parking brake performance (16 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.85% fail on
Rbt
(18 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.43% fail on
Rbt
- 0.43% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.21% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.21% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.43% fail on
Rbt
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.21% fail on Lever
-
3.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(160% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Visibility
- 3.6% fail on Wipers
- 0.85% fail on Washers
-
0.21% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.21% fail on Windscreen
-
2.6% fail on
Steering
(15 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
(24 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Track rod end (26 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
(24 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Tyres
- 1.5% fail on Condition
- 0.43% fail on Tread depth
-
0.85% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.43% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.43% fail on Condition
- 0.43% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.43% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.64% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
0.21% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.21% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.21% fail on
Doors
-
0.21% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.21% fail on Door condition
-
0.21% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.21% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.21% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.21% fail on
Fuel system
-
0.64% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.64% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.43% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.21% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.21% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.43% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.64% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.43% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.43% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
SsangYong Rexton (2017 - 2024)
Lots of car for the money, seven-seat cabin and surprisingly good quality, great off-road and when towing.