SsangYong Rexton MOT Results

Registered in 2010

44.4% pass rate

from 54 tests in 2021

(61% worse than other 2010 cars)

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Rexton is unusually good or bad.

30% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 11% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 9.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 9.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Headlamps
  - 7.4% fail on Headlamp
- 5.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.9% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
  - 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 1.9% fail on Battery(ies)
17% fail on Brakes
- 13% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 7.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 3.7% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (38 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 5.6% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 5.6% fail on Rbt (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      - 5.6% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
    - 3.7% fail on Rbt
      - 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
  - 1.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 5.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 1.9% fail on Brake pads
  - 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.9% fail on Brake discs
- 1.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 1.9% fail on Electronic stability control
17% fail on Visibility (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 15% fail on Wipers (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Washers
17% fail on Suspension
- 9.3% fail on Suspension arms
  - 7.4% fail on Ball joint
  - 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
- 5.6% fail on Wheel bearings (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 1.9% fail on Linkage
  - 1.9% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 1.9% fail on Other suspension component
  - 1.9% fail on Ball joint
15% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Exhaust system
- 5.6% fail on Transmission
  - 3.7% fail on Prop shafts (52 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 1.9% fail on Prop shaft
    - 1.9% fail on Joints
  - 1.9% fail on Drive shafts
    - 1.9% fail on Joints
- 3.7% fail on Chassis (163 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 3.7% fail on Chassis condition (167 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 1.9% fail on Body
  - 1.9% fail on Other body component
- 1.9% fail on Cabs
  - 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
13% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 13% fail on Steering linkage components (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 13% fail on Track rod end (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
7.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 5.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 3.7% fail on Compression ignition
    - 3.7% fail on Emissions not tested (31 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.9% fail on Spark ignition
    - 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.9% fail on Noise suppression
  - 1.9% fail on Sound deadening material
3.7% fail on Tyres
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth
1.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.9% fail on Seat belts
  - 1.9% fail on Condition