SsangYong Rexton MOT Results

Registered in 2010
50.0% pass rate
from 60 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Rexton is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Suspension (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 10% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 10% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 5.0% fail on Springs
      • 5.0% fail on Coil springs
        • 5.0% fail on Coil spring
    • 5.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (161 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.7% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.3% fail on Position lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Position lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt
          • 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
    • 3.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.7% fail on Pedal
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 10% fail on Exhaust system (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Towbar
      • 1.7% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission
      • 1.7% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.7% fail on Prop shaft
    • 1.7% fail on Doors
      • 1.7% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 1.7% fail on Door condition
  • 10% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.7% fail on Steering play
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack
  • 6.7% fail on Visibility
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 1.7% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.7% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 5.0% fail on Condition
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth
  • 5.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 3.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.7% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages