MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » SsangYong » Rexton » 2009

SsangYong Rexton MOT Results

Registered in 2009
49.6% pass rate
from 270 tests in 2021
(33% worse than other 2009 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Rexton is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Suspension arm (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 7.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Pins and bushes (36 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (53 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.37% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 5.6% fail on Wheel bearings (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Springs (61% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Coil springs (61% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.74% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.74% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.37% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.37% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.37% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.37% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Headlamps (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 7.0% fail on Stop lamp (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 1.1% fail on Rear reflectors (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (62 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (77 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.37% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.37% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.37% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.37% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 20% fail on Brakes (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 3.0% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (34 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.74% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.74% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.2% fail on Brake performance not tested (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.37% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.37% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.37% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 6.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.6% fail on Brake pads (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.6% fail on Brake discs
    • 5.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.74% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.74% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.74% fail on Hydraulic systems (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.37% fail on Brake fluid
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Transmission
      • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.9% fail on Joints
      • 0.37% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.37% fail on Joints
    • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Chassis (32 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Chassis condition (32 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.74% fail on Tank (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Doors
      • 0.74% fail on Other passenger's door (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Door condition (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Seats (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Passenger's seat (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Body
      • 0.37% fail on Other body component
  • 13% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Power steering (30 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Other components (76 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Pipes and hoses (33 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 7.8% fail on Visibility
    • 4.8% fail on Washers
    • 2.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.74% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.37% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.37% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.74% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.37% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.37% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.74% fail on Other leaks (31 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.74% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.74% fail on Condition
  • 0.74% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.74% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages