SsangYong Rexton MOT Results

Registered in 2009
54.1% pass rate
from 305 tests in 2020
(30% worse than other 2009 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Rexton is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (52% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Stop lamp (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Headlamp (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 6.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Switch (121 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Position lamps (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Position lamp (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.98% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (63 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (78 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Rear reflectors (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.33% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.33% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 20% fail on Suspension (60% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Linkage (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Pins and bushes (42 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.66% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.33% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 8.2% fail on Suspension arms (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.33% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.3% fail on Wheel bearings (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Springs
      • 3.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.3% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.66% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.33% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
  • 19% fail on Brakes (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (29 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 4.3% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Decelerometer (82 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.66% fail on Parking brake performance (259 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.33% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake performance not tested (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.98% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Cable (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 4.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Electronic stability control (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Pedal (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.66% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.66% fail on Lever
    • 0.33% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.33% fail on Servos
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Transmission
      • 0.98% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.98% fail on Joints
      • 0.98% fail on Prop shafts (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Joints (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.98% fail on Chassis (60 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Chassis condition (62 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Towbar (179 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Vehicle structure (713 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.33% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.33% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.33% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 9.5% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Steering linkage components (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.33% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.33% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.33% fail on Power steering
      • 0.33% fail on Operation
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.33% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.33% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.33% fail on View to rear
      • 0.33% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
  • 3.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.6% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.98% fail on Emissions not tested (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.33% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.98% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.98% fail on Attachment
  • 0.33% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.33% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages