SsangYong Rexton MOT Results

Registered in 2005
51.1% pass rate
from 709 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Rexton is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (39% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 14% fail on Rear fog lamp (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 13% fail on Fog lamp (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Tell tale (98 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Switch (74 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Stop lamp (74% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 7.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Rear lamps (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Headlamps (63% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Headlamp (69% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 0.99% fail on Direction indicators (66% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Flashing type (66% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.28% fail on Individual lamps (85% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Battery
    • 0.56% fail on Horn
    • 0.28% fail on Trailer electrical socket (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.14% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.14% fail on Switch
  • 23% fail on Brakes (73% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 11% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Rear wheels (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.71% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.42% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.28% fail on Parking brake operation (52 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 11% fail on Components (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 10% fail on Pipes (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Hoses
        • 0.14% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.99% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.56% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.28% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.7% fail on Electronic stability system (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on ABS
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.85% fail on Service brake control components (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Condition (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.85% fail on Mechanical components (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Lever (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Restricted movement
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 5.1% fail on Drive shafts
      • 5.1% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 5.1% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 3.7% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (65% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.71% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.42% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Component mounting (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Spring mounting (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Front (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.99% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.28% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.14% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment
  • 10% fail on Steering (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Steering system (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Track rod end (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.14% fail on Steering box
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Lock stop
    • 2.1% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Other components (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Operation
      • 0.28% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.42% fail on Locking devices (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.14% fail on Steering control
      • 0.14% fail on Steering column
  • 7.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.28% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.28% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust system (70% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Emissions
    • 0.85% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.56% fail on Tank (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on System
    • 0.56% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres (36% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (56% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 3.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Vehicle structure (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Chassis (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Body condition
    • 0.28% fail on Load security (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Bootlid
      • 0.14% fail on Loading door
    • 0.14% fail on Doors
      • 0.14% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.14% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers
    • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel
  • 2.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.1% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 2.0% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.71% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
      • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.4% fail on Towbars (194 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Vehicle structure (382 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Towbar
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages