SsangYong Rexton MOT Results
Registered in 200547.7% pass rate
from 371 tests in 2021
(19% worse than other 2005 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Rexton is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Brakes
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
11% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(170% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 5.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (19 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Parking brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.27% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance
-
5.7% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
- 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.54% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.27% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.27% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.27% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.27% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
- 1.6% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.54% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.54% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
11% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(170% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 13% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(95% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.9% fail on Brake discs
-
0.54% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.27% fail on Cable
- 0.27% fail on Lever
-
4.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Electronic stability control (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
1.1% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.54% fail on Pedal
- 0.54% fail on Hand lever
-
0.54% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.54% fail on Lever
-
0.27% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.27% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
27% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(72% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
12% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
12% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
12% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Headlamps
(77% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 9.2% fail on Headlamp (85% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.54% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.81% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.54% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.3% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(32 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (44 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.54% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.54% fail on Horn
- 0.27% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.27% fail on Rear reflectors
-
12% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
18% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Transmission
-
3.5% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.5% fail on Joints
-
2.7% fail on
Prop shafts
(12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Prop shaft (27 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Joints (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Drive shafts
-
4.6% fail on
Chassis
(11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Chassis condition (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.3% fail on Tank (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Bumpers
-
0.27% fail on
Body
- 0.27% fail on Other body component
-
0.27% fail on
Doors
-
0.27% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.27% fail on Door condition
-
0.27% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
18% fail on
Suspension
-
6.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.4% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.27% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
5.4% fail on
Springs
-
5.1% fail on
Coil springs
- 5.1% fail on Coil spring
- 0.27% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
5.1% fail on
Coil springs
-
5.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.2% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 4.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.27% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.27% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.27% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
6.5% fail on
Suspension arms
-
13% fail on
Steering
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint
-
1.9% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.9% fail on Steering rack (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Power steering
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Pipes and hoses (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Operation
- 0.27% fail on Rams
-
0.81% fail on
Steering play
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.27% fail on Flexible coupling
-
8.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(180% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
9.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Emissions not tested (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
2.4% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.27% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
7.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.5% fail on
Tyres
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
- 2.4% fail on Condition
- 0.27% fail on Size/type
-
6.2% fail on
Visibility
- 3.2% fail on Wipers
- 2.4% fail on Washers
-
0.54% fail on
View to rear
- 0.54% fail on Mirrors
-
2.7% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.27% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.3% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.3% fail on Registration plates
-
0.27% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.27% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
SsangYong Rexton (2003 - 2012)
Well equipped for the money. Some have seven seats. Capable off-road and a tough all-round workhorse. Keen prices.