MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » SsangYong » Rexton » 2004

SsangYong Rexton MOT Results

Registered in 2004
53.3% pass rate
from 212 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Rexton is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (63% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 10% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Switch
    • 9.9% fail on Headlamps (84% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 9.4% fail on Headlamp (86% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 9.4% fail on Headlamp aim (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Headlamp aim (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (37 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (56 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.47% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.47% fail on Horn
    • 0.47% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.47% fail on Position lamp
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 6.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (31 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.47% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint
    • 5.7% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.47% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.47% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.7% fail on Springs
      • 3.8% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.8% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.94% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (13 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.47% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.47% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.47% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.47% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.47% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (81% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (160% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 8.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 6.6% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 6.1% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 0.47% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.94% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.94% fail on Rbt
          • 0.94% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.94% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.94% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.47% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.47% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 8.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.47% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.47% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.47% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.47% fail on Cable
    • 0.94% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.94% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.47% fail on Pedal
    • 0.47% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.47% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.47% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.47% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 9.4% fail on Steering (110% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Steering linkage components (100% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Track rod end (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.4% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.9% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pipes and hoses (14 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Operation
  • 8.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.7% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.47% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.9% fail on Spark ignition (69% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.94% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.47% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.47% fail on Other leaks
  • 7.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Chassis condition (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission
      • 0.94% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.94% fail on Prop shaft (24 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.47% fail on Joints
    • 0.94% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.94% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.47% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.47% fail on Tank
    • 0.47% fail on Towbar
      • 0.47% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.47% fail on Doors
      • 0.47% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.47% fail on Door condition
    • 0.47% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.47% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 7.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (130% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Requirements
    • 2.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
  • 2.8% fail on Visibility (64% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.94% fail on Wipers
    • 0.47% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.47% fail on Window
  • 0.47% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.47% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages