SsangYong Musso MOT Results

Registered in 2017
53.8% pass rate
from 325 tests in 2021
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Musso is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension (26 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 18% fail on Springs (53 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 18% fail on Coil springs (53 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 18% fail on Coil spring (53 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (33 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Linkage ball joints (68 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms (11 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (86 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Other suspension component (57 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 22% fail on Brakes (9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (37 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (114 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (99 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (494 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake performance (264 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (265 times worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 11% fail on Parking brake performance (305 times worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.31% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.62% fail on Plate brake tester (329 times worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.62% fail on Parking brake performance (748 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.92% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (14 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.92% fail on Rbt (sp) (15 times worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.62% fail on Service brake performance (22 times worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.62% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt
          • 0.62% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.62% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.31% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.31% fail on Cable
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake control (22 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Lever (28 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Rigid brake pipes (36 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.31% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.31% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.31% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.31% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (24 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (33 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (33 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 4.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (33 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.62% fail on Position lamps (29 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Position lamp (32 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Reversing lamps (16 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Reversing lamps (17 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (174 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (214 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.31% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.31% fail on Horn
  • 7.7% fail on Visibility (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Wipers (160% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Washers
    • 0.31% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.31% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.5% fail on Steering (15 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Steering linkage components (23 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end (25 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.31% fail on Condition
  • 1.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Seat belts (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Condition
      • 0.31% fail on Requirements
    • 0.31% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.92% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.92% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.62% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.62% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.31% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.31% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.62% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.62% fail on Seats (32 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Passenger's seat (69 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.31% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages