MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » SsangYong » Musso » 2016

SsangYong Musso MOT Results

Registered in 2016
54.8% pass rate
from 84 tests in 2021
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Musso is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (25 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (70 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (sp) (58 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (387 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Parking brake performance (72 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 7.1% fail on Rbt (75 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 7.1% fail on Parking brake performance (87 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
  • 19% fail on Suspension (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 12% fail on Springs (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 12% fail on Coil springs (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 12% fail on Coil spring (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (34 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (75 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
    • 6.0% fail on Suspension arms (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (88 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (37 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (37 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 7.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (37 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 6.0% fail on Steering (21 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Steering linkage components (26 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Track rod end (28 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 4.8% fail on Visibility
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.2% fail on Transmission
      • 1.2% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.2% fail on Prop shaft
    • 1.2% fail on Body
      • 1.2% fail on Other body component
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 1.2% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.2% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages