SsangYong Musso MOT Results

Registered in 2016
61.3% pass rate
from 93 tests in 2020
(180% worse than other 2016 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Musso is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 17% fail on Springs (25 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 17% fail on Coil springs (25 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 17% fail on Coil spring (26 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (60 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (119 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (108 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
  • 19% fail on Brakes (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (19 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (50 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 8.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (52 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Parking brake performance (91 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 6.5% fail on Rbt (95 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 5.4% fail on Parking brake performance (93 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 8.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Brake pads (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (251 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Cable (587 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (116 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 7.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 1.1% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.1% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 6.5% fail on Visibility (65% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers (81% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Washers
  • 3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Compression ignition (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres (14% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth (67% worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Steering
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.1% fail on Spare wheel
      • 1.1% fail on Spare wheel condition
  • 1.1% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.1% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages