MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » SsangYong » Kyron » 2009

SsangYong Kyron MOT Results

Registered in 2009
40.5% pass rate
from 116 tests in 2021
(53% worse than other 2009 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Kyron is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 8.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.86% fail on Switch
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.7% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (97 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (120 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.86% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.86% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.86% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 24% fail on Suspension (65% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Springs
      • 9.5% fail on Coil springs
        • 9.5% fail on Coil spring
    • 9.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.3% fail on Suspension arm (23 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.6% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.4% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.86% fail on Linkage
    • 0.86% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.86% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 23% fail on Brakes (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 7.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (40 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.86% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 5.2% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.86% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.86% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.86% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake performance not tested (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.86% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.86% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.86% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.86% fail on Rbt
          • 0.86% fail on Service brake performance
    • 5.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.6% fail on Hydraulic systems (23 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Brake fluid (32 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.7% fail on Pedal (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.86% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.86% fail on Lever
  • 11% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.7% fail on Power steering (17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Operation
      • 0.86% fail on Other components
    • 0.86% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.86% fail on Steering rack
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.6% fail on Chassis (57 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Chassis condition (58 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (19 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission
      • 1.7% fail on Prop shafts (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.86% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.86% fail on Joints
    • 0.86% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.86% fail on Tank
  • 9.5% fail on Visibility
    • 6.9% fail on Wipers (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.86% fail on View to rear
      • 0.86% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Seat belts (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Requirements
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
  • 5.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.2% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.86% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages