SsangYong Kyron MOT Results

Registered in 2009
49.1% pass rate
from 159 tests in 2020
(40% worse than other 2009 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Kyron is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (75% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Headlamps (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Headlamp (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.63% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.63% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.63% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.63% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.63% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.63% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.63% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 17% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (24 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Plate brake tester (67 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (131 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.63% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.63% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.63% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.63% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.63% fail on Pedal
    • 0.63% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.63% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.63% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.63% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.63% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 14% fail on Steering (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 12% fail on Steering linkage components (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 11% fail on Track rod end (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.3% fail on Steering gear (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Power steering (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Other components (43 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Exhaust system (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Chassis (156 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Chassis condition (162 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Towbar (460 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Vehicle structure (1825 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.63% fail on Tank
    • 0.63% fail on Transmission
      • 0.63% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.63% fail on Prop shaft
  • 8.2% fail on Visibility
    • 6.9% fail on Wipers (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
  • 8.2% fail on Suspension
    • 3.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.63% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.5% fail on Springs
      • 2.5% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.5% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.63% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.63% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres
    • 6.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
  • 6.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.7% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested (17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.63% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 1.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.63% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.63% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.63% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.63% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 3.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Requirements (107 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.63% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.63% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.63% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages