SsangYong Korando MOT Results
Registered in 201674.2% pass rate
from 1,253 tests in 2021
(68% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Korando is unusually good or bad.
-
9.6% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(170% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.5% fail on Stop lamp (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp (98% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.56% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.24% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.56% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.16% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(33 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (39 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.080% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.080% fail on Horn
-
0.080% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.080% fail on Position lamp
-
0.080% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.080% fail on Reversing lamps
-
8.1% fail on
Brakes
(190% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Brake performance
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (42 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
2.6% fail on
Parking brake performance
(25 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
(25 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance (27 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.080% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.080% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
(25 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.80% fail on
Rbt
- 0.80% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Rbt
- 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
-
1.0% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Brake discs (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Cable
- 0.080% fail on Lever
- 0.080% fail on Linkage
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (26 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Parking brake control
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Lever (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.24% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.080% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.080% fail on Servos
-
0.080% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.080% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
4.8% fail on
Brake performance
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Visibility
(47% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Wipers
- 3.0% fail on Washers (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Bonnet
-
5.3% fail on
Suspension
(160% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Springs
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.32% fail on Ball joint
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.72% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Linkage ball joints (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.080% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.48% fail on Wheel bearings (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Other suspension component
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Ball joint
- 0.080% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.080% fail on Shock absorbers
-
3.6% fail on
Springs
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Tyres
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 2.2% fail on Tread depth
-
0.96% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
0.72% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Prop shafts
(32 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Prop shaft (60 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Bearing housing (96 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.16% fail on Joints
-
0.56% fail on
Prop shafts
(32 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Bumpers
-
0.080% fail on
Body
- 0.080% fail on Other body component
-
0.080% fail on
Seats
- 0.080% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.72% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(180% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.40% fail on Condition
- 0.080% fail on Requirements
- 0.32% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.48% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.56% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.56% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.56% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.48% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.080% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.56% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.56% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.40% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.40% fail on Registration plates
-
0.32% fail on
Steering
-
0.32% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.32% fail on Track rod end
-
0.32% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.32% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.32% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
SsangYong Korando (2011 - 2019)
Stylish exterior. Well-equipped as standard. Impressive warranty.