SsangYong Korando MOT Results

Registered in 2016
82.0% pass rate
from 1,260 tests in 2020
(50% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Korando is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (81% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Switch (29 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.48% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.48% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.24% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.24% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.16% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.16% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.079% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.079% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.16% fail on Trailer electrical socket (16 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.079% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.079% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 5.6% fail on Brakes (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Brake performance (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (16 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (16 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (35 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (27 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (25 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (28 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.079% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester (105 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance (196 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.32% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake performance (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.079% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.079% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (99% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.32% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.32% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (26 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Cable (61 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.24% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.24% fail on Lever
    • 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.079% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.079% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.079% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 4.4% fail on Visibility (56% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers (78% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.079% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.079% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.87% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.079% fail on Size/type
  • 2.7% fail on Suspension (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Springs (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Coil springs (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Coil spring (16 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.079% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.079% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.16% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.079% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 0.40% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.40% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.32% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.32% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.079% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.079% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.32% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.32% fail on Attachment
  • 0.24% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.24% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.16% fail on Steering
    • 0.079% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.079% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.079% fail on Steering play
      • 0.079% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.16% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.079% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.079% fail on Requirements
    • 0.079% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.079% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.079% fail on Transmission
      • 0.079% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.079% fail on Prop shaft
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages