SsangYong Korando MOT Results

Registered in 2015
68.0% pass rate
from 1,474 tests in 2021
(73% worse than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Korando is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.068% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.61% fail on Electrical equipment (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Trailer electrical socket (70 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.34% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.20% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.14% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.34% fail on Rear reflectors (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.068% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.068% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.068% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.068% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 10% fail on Brakes (190% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Brake performance (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.75% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (57 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance (16 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (17 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance (18 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.068% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.068% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.75% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.75% fail on Rbt
          • 0.68% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.068% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.14% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.14% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (52% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (66% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Brake pads (59% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Brake linings (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.61% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.068% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.068% fail on Cable
    • 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (19 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Electronic stability control (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.14% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.14% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 5.6% fail on Suspension (74% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Springs (79% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Coil springs (79% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Coil spring (79% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Suspension arms (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Ball joint dust cover (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.75% fail on Anti-roll bars (150% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Linkage ball joints (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.068% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.27% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.20% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.14% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.068% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.068% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.068% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.068% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.068% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.068% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 5.3% fail on Visibility (35% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Washers (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.068% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.068% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
  • 1.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (97% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Transmission (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Prop shafts (52 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Prop shaft (65 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Flexible couplings (189 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Bearing housing (113 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Joints (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.34% fail on Joints
    • 0.14% fail on Doors
      • 0.14% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
    • 0.068% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.068% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.068% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.068% fail on Body
      • 0.068% fail on Other body component
  • 0.68% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.41% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.34% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
  • 0.54% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.54% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  • 0.34% fail on Steering
    • 0.27% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.27% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.068% fail on Power steering
      • 0.068% fail on Rams
    • 0.068% fail on Steering play
      • 0.068% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.14% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.14% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.14% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (88% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Exhaust emissions (88% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.068% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.068% fail on Emissions not tested
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages