SsangYong Korando MOT Results
Registered in 201568.0% pass rate
from 1,474 tests in 2021
(73% worse than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Korando is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Stop lamp (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.068% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.6% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp
-
0.61% fail on
Electrical equipment
(4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Trailer electrical socket (70 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.34% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.20% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.14% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.34% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.34% fail on Rear reflectors (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.068% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.068% fail on Position lamp
-
0.068% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.068% fail on Reversing lamps
-
10% fail on
Brakes
(190% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Brake performance
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (57 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Parking brake performance
(16 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
(17 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance (18 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.068% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.068% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
(17 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.75% fail on
Rbt
- 0.68% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.068% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.75% fail on
Rbt
- 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.14% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(52% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(66% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Brake pads (59% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Brake linings (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.61% fail on Brake discs
-
0.068% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.068% fail on Cable
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(66% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (19 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Parking brake control
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Electronic stability control (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.14% fail on Hand lever
- 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
5.4% fail on
Brake performance
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Suspension
(74% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Springs
(79% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Coil springs
(79% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Coil spring (79% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Coil springs
(79% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(110% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Ball joint dust cover (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.75% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(150% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Linkage ball joints (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.068% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.27% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.20% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.14% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.068% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.068% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.068% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.068% fail on Ball joint
-
0.068% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.068% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.9% fail on
Springs
(79% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Visibility
(35% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Washers (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Wipers
-
0.068% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.068% fail on Windscreen
-
5.2% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
- 2.6% fail on Condition
-
1.8% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(97% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Transmission
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Prop shafts
(52 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Prop shaft (65 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Flexible couplings (189 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Bearing housing (113 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Joints (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.34% fail on Joints
-
1.3% fail on
Prop shafts
(52 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Doors
-
0.14% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.14% fail on Door condition
-
0.14% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.068% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
0.068% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.068% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
0.068% fail on
Sub-frame
-
0.068% fail on
Body
- 0.068% fail on Other body component
-
1.6% fail on
Transmission
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.41% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.34% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.34% fail on Condition
-
0.54% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.54% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Steering
-
0.27% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.27% fail on Track rod end
-
0.068% fail on
Power steering
- 0.068% fail on Rams
-
0.068% fail on
Steering play
- 0.068% fail on Steering rack
-
0.27% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.14% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.14% fail on Registration plates
-
0.14% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(88% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(88% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.068% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.068% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.14% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.14% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(88% better than other 2015 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
SsangYong Korando (2011 - 2019)
Stylish exterior. Well-equipped as standard. Impressive warranty.