smart Roadster MOT Results
Registered in 200567.8% pass rate
from 469 tests in 2021
(28% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the smart Roadster is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(100% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Flashing type
(100% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.64% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Flashing type
(100% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.85% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Electrical equipment
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Horn (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.64% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
0.21% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.21% fail on Position lamp
-
0.21% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.21% fail on Switch
-
5.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(100% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
10% fail on
Suspension
(39% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint
- 0.85% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.21% fail on Suspension arm
-
3.0% fail on
Springs
-
3.0% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.0% fail on Coil spring
-
3.0% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(76% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Ball joint
- 0.64% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
0.64% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.64% fail on Ball joint
-
0.21% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.21% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
4.5% fail on
Suspension arms
-
8.5% fail on
Brakes
(36% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.0% fail on
Brake performance
(60% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.64% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(74% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (73% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.64% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.64% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.43% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.64% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.21% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.21% fail on
Rbt
- 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.21% fail on
Rbt
-
2.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.21% fail on Electronic stability control
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.1% fail on Lever
-
0.85% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(73% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.85% fail on Brake discs
-
0.85% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.43% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.43% fail on Pedal
-
4.7% fail on
Visibility
- 3.8% fail on Wipers
- 1.3% fail on Washers (65% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(57% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Fuel system
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Doors
-
0.64% fail on
Driver's door
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.21% fail on Door condition
-
0.64% fail on
Driver's door
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Engine mounting
(7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Engine mounting condition (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Bracket
-
0.64% fail on
Seats
- 0.43% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.21% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.21% fail on Bumpers
-
0.21% fail on
Transmission
-
0.21% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.21% fail on Joints
-
0.21% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.5% fail on
Fuel system
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Steering
-
3.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.2% fail on Track rod end
- 0.21% fail on Steering wheel
-
3.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
2.8% fail on
Tyres
(57% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth
- 0.64% fail on Size/type
- 0.43% fail on Condition (85% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(72% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(80% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(75% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.64% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (76% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(75% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.64% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
1.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(80% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.64% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.43% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.21% fail on Attachment
- 0.21% fail on Condition
-
0.64% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.64% fail on Registration plates
-
0.64% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.43% fail on Condition
- 0.21% fail on Attachment
-
0.21% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.21% fail on Speedometer
Read the Honest John Review
-
Smart Roadster (2003 - 2007)
Cute looks, comfortable ride and good grip. You can raise the hood while driving along. Makes far more sense second-hand.