Skoda Yeti MOT Results
Registered in 201788.7% pass rate
from 11,274 tests in 2021
(20% better than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Skoda Yeti is unusually good or bad.
-
3.3% fail on
Tyres
- 2.9% fail on Condition (47% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Tread depth (77% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.053% fail on Size/type
-
2.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
(32% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (33% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.45% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.31% fail on Headlamp
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (170% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0089% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.18% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.18% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.13% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.044% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.18% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.11% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.062% fail on Horn
- 0.035% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0089% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.080% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.080% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.080% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.080% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.035% fail on Stop lamp (89% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.0089% fail on All position lamps
- 0.0089% fail on Position lamp
-
0.018% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.018% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.018% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (91% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0089% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.0089% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
(32% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Visibility
(35% better than other 2017 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Wipers (24% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Washers (71% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.027% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.027% fail on Windscreen
-
0.018% fail on
View to rear
- 0.018% fail on Mirrors
- 0.0089% fail on Driver's view
- 0.0089% fail on Bonnet
-
0.90% fail on
Suspension
-
0.53% fail on
Springs
(56% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Coil springs
(56% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Coil spring (58% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Coil springs
(56% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.12% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.053% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.035% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.018% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0089% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0089% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.053% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.027% fail on
Suspension arms
(88% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Pins and bushes (86% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0089% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.0089% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.0089% fail on Ball joint
-
0.53% fail on
Springs
(56% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Brakes
(60% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(56% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(64% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Brake pads (64% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.27% fail on Brake discs
-
0.0089% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.0089% fail on Cable
-
0.44% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(64% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Brake performance
(59% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake performance
(50% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt
(49% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.027% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt
(49% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.027% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.027% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.027% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.018% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.027% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.027% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(79% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.027% fail on Rbt (sp) (78% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0089% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.0089% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.0089% fail on
Rbt
- 0.0089% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.0089% fail on
Rbt
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake performance
(50% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.035% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.027% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.018% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.0089% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.0089% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.65% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(56% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(48% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(51% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Spark ignition
(54% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (55% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.053% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.0089% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.12% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.14% fail on
Spark ignition
(54% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.027% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.018% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.0089% fail on Other leaks
-
0.26% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(51% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.11% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.11% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.11% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(60% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.053% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.027% fail on
Transmission
(74% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.027% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.027% fail on Joints
-
0.027% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.018% fail on
Seats
- 0.018% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.0089% fail on Bumpers
-
0.0089% fail on
Towbar
- 0.0089% fail on Towbar condition
-
0.0089% fail on
Doors
-
0.0089% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.0089% fail on Catch
-
0.0089% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.071% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(65% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Registration plates (65% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.044% fail on
Road Wheels
(72% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Attachment
- 0.0089% fail on Condition
-
0.018% fail on
Steering
(88% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0089% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.0089% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0089% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.0089% fail on
Steering gear
Read the Honest John Review
-
Skoda Yeti (2009 - 2017)
Unique styling. Solid build. Excellent petrol engines including frugal yet peppy 1.2 TSI. Good space in the back. Frugal 1.6 TDI Greenline can return 60mpg+.