Skoda Yeti MOT Results

Registered in 2010
72.5% pass rate
from 4,150 tests in 2020
(19% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Skoda Yeti is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Suspension (13% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Linkage ball joints (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.072% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.048% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.024% fail on Linkage
      • 0.024% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.6% fail on Springs
      • 3.6% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.6% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.024% fail on Mounting
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms (40% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint dust cover (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.48% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.14% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.096% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.024% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.024% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.048% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.048% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.024% fail on Axles
      • 0.024% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.024% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.024% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 8.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (37% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.96% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.048% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Headlamp (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Headlamp levelling device (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.024% fail on Matched pair
    • 0.82% fail on Position lamps (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Position lamp (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.024% fail on Switch
    • 0.53% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.53% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.46% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.17% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Stop lamp (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.14% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.096% fail on Horn
      • 0.048% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.048% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.024% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.024% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.024% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.024% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 5.3% fail on Brakes (25% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.048% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.024% fail on Cable
        • 0.024% fail on Lever
    • 2.1% fail on Brake performance (35% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (33% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.024% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.072% fail on Decelerometer (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.072% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.072% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.048% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.024% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.67% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (49% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt (sp) (61% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.29% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.096% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.024% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance (68% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Rbt (75% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.096% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.024% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.024% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.024% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.024% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.024% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.024% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.43% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.39% fail on Electronic stability control (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.19% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.19% fail on Lever
    • 0.17% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.12% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.072% fail on Pedal
    • 0.072% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.072% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.048% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.048% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.048% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Condition (31% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Size/type
  • 2.0% fail on Visibility (59% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Wipers (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Washers (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.096% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.072% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.072% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.072% fail on View to rear
      • 0.072% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (37% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Transmission
      • 0.87% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.87% fail on Joints
      • 0.096% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.048% fail on Joints
        • 0.024% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.024% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 0.77% fail on Exhaust system (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.096% fail on System (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Hose
      • 0.024% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.096% fail on Doors
      • 0.072% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.072% fail on Door condition
      • 0.024% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.024% fail on Door condition
    • 0.048% fail on Body
      • 0.024% fail on Panel
      • 0.024% fail on Other body component
    • 0.024% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.024% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.024% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 1.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (38% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (37% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.72% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.072% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.048% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.048% fail on Particulate filter (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.024% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.75% fail on Spark ignition (50% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.072% fail on Catalyst emissions (89% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.048% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.072% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.048% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.024% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.024% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.024% fail on Undertray
  • 0.67% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.53% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Seat belts (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.024% fail on Airbags
      • 0.024% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.27% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.27% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.22% fail on Steering (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.072% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.072% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.048% fail on Steering linkage components (97% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.024% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.048% fail on Steering play
      • 0.048% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.048% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 0.024% fail on Condition
  • 0.048% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter (24 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.048% fail on Speedometer (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Skoda Yeti (2009 - 2017)
    Unique styling. Solid build. Excellent petrol engines including frugal yet peppy 1.2 TSI. Good space in the back. Frugal 1.6 TDI Greenline can return 60mpg+.

    Search Good Garages