MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Skoda » Yeti » 2010

Skoda Yeti MOT Results

Registered in 2010
68.9% pass rate
from 3,961 tests in 2021
(14% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Skoda Yeti is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension (18% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Linkage ball joints (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage
    • 5.3% fail on Springs
      • 5.2% fail on Coil springs
        • 5.2% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.025% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.66% fail on Suspension arm (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.48% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.25% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.076% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.025% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.025% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.025% fail on Sub-frame
  • 7.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (35% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Side repeaters (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.96% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.025% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (26% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.076% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.83% fail on Stop lamp (71% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.58% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.58% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.25% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.13% fail on Horn
      • 0.10% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.025% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.050% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.050% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.050% fail on Reversing lamps (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Reversing lamps (81% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 6.5% fail on Brakes (18% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (31% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.73% fail on Rbt (sp) (57% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt
          • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.050% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.050% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.050% fail on Parking brake performance (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.076% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.076% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.88% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.88% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.050% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.050% fail on Cable
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (91% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.10% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.025% fail on Pedal
    • 0.13% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.076% fail on Rigid brake pipes (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Parking brake control (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Lever (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.050% fail on Brake fluid
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres (37% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition (27% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Size/type
  • 2.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (32% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Transmission
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Joints
        • 0.025% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.13% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.076% fail on Joints
        • 0.050% fail on Flexible couplings (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Exhaust system (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition
      • 0.10% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.10% fail on Door condition
    • 0.050% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.050% fail on Undertray
    • 0.025% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.025% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.025% fail on Body
      • 0.025% fail on Other body component
    • 0.025% fail on Seats
      • 0.025% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.025% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.025% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 2.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (26% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (26% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Spark ignition (57% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.76% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.076% fail on Catalyst emissions (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.076% fail on Emissions not tested (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.050% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.025% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.025% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.025% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.025% fail on Undertray
  • 2.3% fail on Visibility (57% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Wipers (41% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Washers (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.050% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.050% fail on View to rear
      • 0.050% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.83% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.58% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.28% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
  • 0.40% fail on Steering (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Steering linkage components (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.025% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.025% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.025% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.025% fail on Steering play
      • 0.025% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.025% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.20% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.20% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 0.025% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Skoda Yeti (2009 - 2017)
    Unique styling. Solid build. Excellent petrol engines including frugal yet peppy 1.2 TSI. Good space in the back. Frugal 1.6 TDI Greenline can return 60mpg+.

    Search Good Garages