Skoda Yeti MOT Results

Registered in 2010
79.9% pass rate
from 3,537 tests in 2017
(31% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Skoda Yeti is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.6% fail on Suspension
    • 4.0% fail on Coil springs
      • 4.0% fail on Condition (24% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.028% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.68% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.68% fail on Condition
    • 0.54% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.51% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.51% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.028% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.028% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.45% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.31% fail on Front
      • 0.14% fail on Rear
    • 0.28% fail on Suspension arms (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.057% fail on Front suspension joints (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.028% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.028% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 7.3% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (30% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.057% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.4% fail on Position lamps (51% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Front lamps (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Rear lamps
    • 0.93% fail on Headlamps (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Headlamp (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.085% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
        • 0.028% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.085% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.085% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plate lamp (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.25% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.11% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Stop lamp (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Horn
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.057% fail on Battery
    • 0.028% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition (38% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.028% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.028% fail on Size/type
  • 2.9% fail on Brakes (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Hub components (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake pads (45% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.028% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.0% fail on Brake performance (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Rear wheels (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance (58% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.028% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.028% fail on Brake operation
    • 0.23% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.11% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.085% fail on Hydraulic systems (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Components (86% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.057% fail on Hoses
      • 0.028% fail on Operation
    • 0.057% fail on ABS
    • 0.028% fail on Additional braking devices
  • 2.2% fail on Driver's view of the road (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Wipers (42% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Washers (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.028% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.65% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.42% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.42% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.23% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
  • 0.65% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Exhaust system (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on Cap
      • 0.085% fail on System
    • 0.085% fail on Emissions
    • 0.028% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.25% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.25% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.11% fail on Steering (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Steering system (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.085% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment
  • 0.085% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.057% fail on Doors
      • 0.057% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.028% fail on Body condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Skoda Yeti (2009 - 2017)
    Unique styling. Solid build. Excellent petrol engines including frugal yet peppy 1.2 TSI. Good space in the back. Frugal 1.6 TDI Greenline can return 60mpg+.

    Search Good Garages