Skoda Superb MOT Results
Registered in 201685.2% pass rate
from 8,676 tests in 2021
(16% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Skoda Superb is unusually good or bad.
-
4.7% fail on
Tyres
(20% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Condition (37% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.046% fail on Size/type
-
2.6% fail on
Brakes
-
2.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads
-
0.84% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(76% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Brake discs (76% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.39% fail on
Brake performance
(46% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.25% fail on
Rbt
- 0.23% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.023% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.25% fail on
Rbt
-
0.069% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(70% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Rbt (sp) (69% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.058% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.058% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.035% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.023% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.058% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.046% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.25% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.069% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.069% fail on Electronic parking brake (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.069% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Brake fluid (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.012% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.012% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.012% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.012% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.012% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.012% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
2.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.2% fail on
Suspension
- 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Springs
(31% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Coil springs
(30% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Coil spring (30% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Coil springs
(30% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.13% fail on
Suspension arms
(74% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes (58% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Ball joint (88% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.046% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(77% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Ball joint
- 0.012% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.012% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.012% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.023% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.023% fail on Ball joint
-
0.012% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.012% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
2.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(42% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.035% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.31% fail on
Headlamps
(57% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Headlamp (62% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.012% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.10% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.10% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.092% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.012% fail on Switch
-
0.10% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.081% fail on
Direction indicators
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.081% fail on
Flashing type
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.023% fail on Side repeaters (92% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.081% fail on
Flashing type
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.081% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.081% fail on Horn
- 0.069% fail on Stop lamp (89% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.012% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
1.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(84% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(90% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.023% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.38% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.37% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.012% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
1.2% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.012% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
1.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(90% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Visibility
(76% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Wipers (82% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Washers (74% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.10% fail on Windscreen
-
0.023% fail on
View to rear
- 0.023% fail on Mirrors
- 0.012% fail on Bonnet
-
0.36% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
0.13% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Front passenger's door
(12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Door condition (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Front passenger's door
(12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.092% fail on
Transmission
(58% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.081% fail on
Drive shafts
(60% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Joints (71% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Drive shaft (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.012% fail on Joints
-
0.081% fail on
Drive shafts
(60% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.035% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.023% fail on Tank (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Pipe
- 0.035% fail on Undertray
-
0.023% fail on
Towbar
(13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Coupling
- 0.012% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.023% fail on
Body
- 0.023% fail on Other body component
-
0.012% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.012% fail on Bracket
-
0.012% fail on
Seats
- 0.012% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.13% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.18% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.18% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.023% fail on
Airbags
- 0.012% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.012% fail on Passengers airbag
-
0.18% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.17% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
- 0.023% fail on Condition
-
0.092% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.092% fail on Registration plates
-
0.046% fail on
Steering
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.035% fail on
Steering linkage components
(84% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Track rod end (89% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Other components
- 0.012% fail on Steering linkage
-
0.012% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.012% fail on Steering rack
-
0.035% fail on
Steering linkage components
(84% better than other 2016 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Skoda Superb (2015 - 2024)
Offers limousine levels of comfort and space, but with a very affordable price tag. Efficient engine options include plug-in hybrid models. Boot capacity is truly huge.