Skoda Superb MOT Results
Registered in 200970.0% pass rate
from 1,579 tests in 2017
(9.4% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Skoda Superb is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(17% better than other 2009 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Direction indicators
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.19% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.5% fail on Front lamps
- 0.57% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.063% fail on All position lamps
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (44% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp (40% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
(9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Headlamp levelling device (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp levelling device (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 1.1% fail on Stop lamp (67% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Fog lamp (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Battery
- 0.063% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.063% fail on Horn
-
3.5% fail on
Direction indicators
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
13% fail on
Suspension
-
5.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(100% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.13% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Linkage condition
-
3.7% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.7% fail on Condition
-
2.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.19% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
1.2% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 1.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
1.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
0.89% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.82% fail on Rear (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Front
- 0.38% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.063% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.063% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
5.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(100% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.6% fail on
Tyres
- 5.9% fail on Condition (68% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
- 0.13% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
- 0.13% fail on Size/type
-
3.6% fail on
Brakes
(45% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Hub components
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
- 0.19% fail on Brake discs
- 0.19% fail on Brake back plates (24 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Brake performance
(51% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Front wheels
- 0.51% fail on Rear wheels (66% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.13% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.063% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.32% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.19% fail on
Components
- 0.19% fail on Hoses
- 0.063% fail on Operation
- 0.063% fail on Leaks
-
0.19% fail on
Components
- 0.32% fail on ABS
- 0.19% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.063% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.063% fail on
Pedal
- 0.063% fail on Condition
-
0.063% fail on
Pedal
-
1.8% fail on
Hub components
-
2.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(52% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Wipers (48% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Washers (76% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Windscreen
- 0.19% fail on Mirrors
- 0.063% fail on Bonnet
-
0.76% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.51% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.51% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.25% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.25% fail on Condition
-
0.51% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.70% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.70% fail on Registration plate
-
0.51% fail on
Steering
(58% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Steering system
- 0.51% fail on Track rod end
-
0.51% fail on
Steering system
-
0.51% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.38% fail on Attachment
- 0.13% fail on Condition
-
0.44% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.19% fail on
Doors
- 0.13% fail on Drivers
- 0.063% fail on Passengers front
-
0.19% fail on
Seats
- 0.13% fail on Drivers
- 0.063% fail on Passengers
- 0.13% fail on Body condition
-
0.063% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.063% fail on Chassis
-
0.19% fail on
Doors
-
0.19% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(90% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.063% fail on Emissions
-
0.063% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.063% fail on Cap
- 0.063% fail on Emissions not tested
Read the Honest John Review
-
Skoda Superb (2008 - 2015)
Limousine-like amounts of rear legroom. Clever dual tailgate means it's both a hatch and a saloon. GreenLine model is very economical. A lot of car for the money.