Skoda Superb MOT Results
Registered in 200354.2% pass rate
from 605 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Skoda Superb is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 12% fail on Registration plate lamp (64% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 9.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
7.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.6% fail on Front lamps
- 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
-
7.3% fail on
Headlamps
(50% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Headlamp (52% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.17% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.33% fail on Tell tale
- 1.7% fail on Stop lamp (71% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.66% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.33% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.17% fail on Switch
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.66% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.66% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Horn
- 0.33% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.17% fail on Battery
- 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
22% fail on
Suspension
-
13% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
13% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 13% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
13% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(51% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (56% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Condition
-
3.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.8% fail on
Coil springs
(59% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.3% fail on Condition
- 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.50% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.33% fail on Front
- 0.17% fail on Rear
-
0.33% fail on
Prescribed areas
(84% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Component mounting
- 0.17% fail on Subframe mounting
-
0.17% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.17% fail on Condition
-
13% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
7.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
6.3% fail on
Components
- 5.3% fail on Hoses (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pipes (70% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Servos
- 0.50% fail on Leaks
- 0.33% fail on Operation
- 0.17% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
6.3% fail on
Components
-
4.6% fail on
Brake performance
(44% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (58% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Front wheels
- 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.17% fail on Brake imbalance
-
1.7% fail on
Hub components
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
- 0.33% fail on Brake discs
- 0.17% fail on Brake calipers
-
0.66% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.66% fail on Condition
- 0.66% fail on ABS
- 0.33% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.33% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
-
0.17% fail on
Components
- 0.17% fail on Pipes
- 0.17% fail on Restricted movement
-
7.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
8.9% fail on
Tyres
- 4.8% fail on Condition
- 4.6% fail on Tread depth
- 0.33% fail on Size/type
-
6.6% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.0% fail on Wipers
- 2.0% fail on Washers
- 1.3% fail on Windscreen
- 0.83% fail on Mirrors
-
3.6% fail on
Steering
-
3.3% fail on
Steering system
- 2.3% fail on Track rod end
- 1.2% fail on Steering rack
- 0.17% fail on Steering operation
- 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
-
3.3% fail on
Steering system
-
3.5% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
3.0% fail on
Doors
(4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Passengers other (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Passengers front (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Drivers (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Body condition
-
0.17% fail on
Load security
- 0.17% fail on Bootlid
-
3.0% fail on
Doors
(4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
2.0% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.7% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.17% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.17% fail on Passengers airbag
-
0.50% fail on
Seat belts
(73% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Requirements
-
2.0% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
2.3% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(69% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Exhaust system (73% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Emissions (70% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.17% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.17% fail on Hose
-
0.83% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.83% fail on Registration plate
-
0.50% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.50% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Skoda Superb (2002 - 2008)
Old model Passat stretched with extra rear legroom. Well liked by owners, especially taxi drivers.