MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Skoda » Roomster » 2010

Skoda Roomster MOT Results

Registered in 2010
67.7% pass rate
from 1,478 tests in 2021
(12% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Skoda Roomster is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.41% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.068% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.27% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.27% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.20% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.20% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.068% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.068% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.068% fail on Horn
    • 0.068% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.068% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 7.9% fail on Suspension (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Springs
      • 4.2% fail on Coil springs
        • 4.2% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage ball joints (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.068% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.068% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.068% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.61% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.47% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.27% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.068% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.068% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.068% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.068% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.068% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 5.9% fail on Brakes (26% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.068% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.068% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.54% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (70% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt (sp) (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.41% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.34% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt (73% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.068% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.068% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.14% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.068% fail on Cable
        • 0.068% fail on Lever
    • 0.47% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.34% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.14% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.14% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.14% fail on Lever
    • 0.068% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.068% fail on Pedal
    • 0.068% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.068% fail on Servos
    • 0.068% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 5.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
  • 4.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.6% fail on Transmission (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Drive shafts (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Joints (67% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.068% fail on Joints
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.14% fail on Doors
      • 0.14% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
    • 0.068% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.068% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.068% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.068% fail on Seats
      • 0.068% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.068% fail on Undertray
  • 4.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.8% fail on Compression ignition (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.14% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.14% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.068% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.068% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.068% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.74% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.54% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.068% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.14% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.14% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.8% fail on Visibility (29% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.14% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.068% fail on Bonnet
  • 1.2% fail on Steering (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Steering linkage components (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Track rod end (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.068% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.068% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.14% fail on Power steering
      • 0.068% fail on Operation
      • 0.068% fail on Other components
    • 0.068% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.068% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.068% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.068% fail on Steering play
      • 0.068% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.068% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.61% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.47% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
      • 0.068% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.41% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.34% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.068% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.068% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.068% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages