Skoda Roomster MOT Results

Registered in 2010
77.3% pass rate
from 1,332 tests in 2017
(23% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Skoda Roomster is unusually good or bad.

  • 10% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (22% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.45% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Direction indicators (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Flashing type (60% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.15% fail on Battery
    • 0.075% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.075% fail on Fog lamp
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
    • 0.075% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 4.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.38% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.075% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.1% fail on Brakes
    • 2.3% fail on Hub components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.83% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.75% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.75% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.38% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.23% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.23% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.075% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.075% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.075% fail on Leaks
  • 3.3% fail on Suspension (59% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.1% fail on Coil springs (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (65% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Anti-roll bars (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.38% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.23% fail on Front
      • 0.15% fail on Rear
    • 0.30% fail on Suspension arms (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (76% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.90% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.53% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.53% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.38% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
  • 0.83% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.75% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.075% fail on Emissions
  • 0.60% fail on Steering
    • 0.60% fail on Steering system
      • 0.45% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.075% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.075% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.15% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.15% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages