Skoda Roomster MOT Results
Registered in 200863.1% pass rate
from 2,422 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Skoda Roomster is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.0% fail on Stop lamp (52% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.1% fail on Front lamps
- 1.8% fail on Rear lamps (61% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (33% better than other 2008 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 2008 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Direction indicators
(68% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Flashing type
(68% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Individual lamps (140% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.29% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.041% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.041% fail on Switch
-
3.0% fail on
Flashing type
(68% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp
- 0.041% fail on Matched pair
-
0.21% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.21% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.083% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.083% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.041% fail on Battery
-
14% fail on
Suspension
-
5.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 5.2% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Location
-
3.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.50% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.083% fail on Linkage condition
-
3.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(60% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(61% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (62% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.041% fail on Drive shafts
-
3.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(61% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.12% fail on Attachment
-
0.83% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.83% fail on Condition
-
0.78% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.66% fail on Front (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Rear
- 0.21% fail on Front suspension joints (68% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.083% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.083% fail on Condition
-
5.3% fail on
Coil springs
-
8.1% fail on
Tyres
- 4.6% fail on Condition
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
- 0.37% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Size/type
- 0.041% fail on Valve stem
-
5.4% fail on
Brakes
(32% better than other 2008 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Brake performance
- 1.8% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.99% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.78% fail on Front wheels
- 0.21% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.083% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.083% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.4% fail on
Hub components
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads (39% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs (73% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Brake calipers
-
0.37% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(73% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Components
(76% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Hoses
- 0.041% fail on Cylinders
- 0.041% fail on Pipes
- 0.041% fail on Servos
- 0.083% fail on Leaks
-
0.29% fail on
Components
(76% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Parking brake
(71% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Condition (68% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.083% fail on Cable
- 0.041% fail on Lever
- 0.12% fail on ABS
-
0.083% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.083% fail on
Pedal
- 0.041% fail on Condition
- 0.041% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.083% fail on
Pedal
- 0.083% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.041% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.041% fail on
Components
- 0.041% fail on Servos
-
0.041% fail on
Components
-
3.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.6% fail on Wipers
- 1.7% fail on Washers
- 0.29% fail on Windscreen
- 0.041% fail on Bonnet
- 0.041% fail on Mirrors
-
2.1% fail on
Steering
-
1.9% fail on
Steering system
- 1.5% fail on Track rod end (60% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Steering rack
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint
- 0.041% fail on Drag link end
- 0.041% fail on Steering arm
-
0.041% fail on
Other components
- 0.041% fail on Steering pivot point
-
0.29% fail on
Power steering
- 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Other components
-
1.9% fail on
Steering system
-
1.9% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(33% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.25% fail on Emissions (76% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.083% fail on Pipe
- 0.041% fail on Cap
- 0.041% fail on System
- 0.041% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.87% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.62% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.58% fail on Condition
-
0.041% fail on
Installation check
- 0.041% fail on Belt(s)/padding
-
0.25% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.25% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.62% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.54% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.25% fail on
Doors
- 0.17% fail on Passengers other
- 0.083% fail on Passengers front
- 0.12% fail on Body condition
-
0.12% fail on
Load security
(4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Bootlid (11 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Seats
- 0.041% fail on Passengers
-
0.25% fail on
Doors
-
0.33% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.33% fail on Registration plate
-
0.083% fail on
Road Wheels
(79% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Condition
- 0.041% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Skoda Roomster (2006 - 2015)
Roomy boot and plenty of storage space. Decent handling and easy to drive with good visiblity. Well built and good value.