Skoda Fabia MOT Results
Registered in 201584.2% pass rate
from 18,033 tests in 2021
(19% better than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Skoda Fabia is unusually good or bad.
-
3.7% fail on
Tyres
(14% better than other 2015 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth (34% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Size/type
-
3.3% fail on
Visibility
(14% better than other 2015 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Wipers
- 1.0% fail on Washers (26% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.050% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.044% fail on Windscreen
- 0.0055% fail on Window
-
0.033% fail on
View to rear
- 0.033% fail on Mirrors
- 0.011% fail on Driver's view
- 0.011% fail on Bonnet
-
3.0% fail on
Brakes
(16% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(32% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(54% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Brake pads (54% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0055% fail on Brake linings
-
0.79% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(29% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Brake discs (29% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.044% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.028% fail on Lever
- 0.017% fail on Cable
-
0.83% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(54% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Brake performance
(30% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Service brake performance
(79% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
(78% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Service brake performance (83% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.022% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.017% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.0055% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.017% fail on
Decelerometer
(4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
(78% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.29% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.0055% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
0.18% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.17% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.067% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.0055% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.0055% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.0055% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.17% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.078% fail on
Parking brake performance
(52% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.072% fail on
Rbt
(53% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Parking brake performance (55% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.0055% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0055% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.072% fail on
Rbt
(53% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.1% fail on
Service brake performance
(79% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.21% fail on Lever (68% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.13% fail on Hand lever (83% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0055% fail on Pedal
-
0.061% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.033% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.044% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.022% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.011% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.011% fail on Valves (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(75% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.022% fail on Electronic stability control (75% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.0055% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.0055% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.0055% fail on Other components
-
1.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(32% better than other 2015 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(47% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.050% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.46% fail on
Headlamps
(56% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Headlamp (54% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.22% fail on Stop lamp (76% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (79% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.0055% fail on Reversing lamp switch
-
0.089% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(63% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.089% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(63% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Rear fog lamp (63% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.089% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(63% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.061% fail on
Direction indicators
(85% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.061% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Side repeaters (85% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Individual direction indicators (85% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.061% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.055% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.028% fail on Horn
- 0.011% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.011% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.0055% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.044% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.044% fail on Position lamp
-
0.0055% fail on
Outline marker lamps
- 0.0055% fail on Outline marker lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
1.9% fail on
Suspension
(43% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.99% fail on Pins and bushes (140% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Ball joint (91% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Ball joint dust cover (80% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.47% fail on Shock absorbers (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(42% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.039% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.033% fail on Linkage ball joints (69% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Ball joint
- 0.011% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.12% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.094% fail on
Springs
(94% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.094% fail on
Coil springs
(94% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Coil spring (94% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.094% fail on
Coil springs
(94% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.017% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.011% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.0055% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0055% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.0055% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.0055% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.0055% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
1.0% fail on
Suspension arms
-
1.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(44% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(48% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Spark ignition
(140% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (100% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.0055% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.11% fail on
Compression ignition
(77% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (72% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.0055% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
1.5% fail on
Spark ignition
(140% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.011% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.0055% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.0055% fail on Other leaks
-
0.0055% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.0055% fail on Undertray
-
1.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(48% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(36% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Fuel system
(190% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0055% fail on Pipe
- 0.18% fail on Exhaust system (44% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Transmission
(72% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.089% fail on
Drive shafts
(75% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Joints (75% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.017% fail on Joints
-
0.089% fail on
Drive shafts
(75% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.055% fail on
Doors
-
0.033% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.033% fail on Door condition
-
0.017% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.017% fail on Door condition
-
0.0055% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.0055% fail on Door condition
-
0.033% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.028% fail on
Body
- 0.017% fail on Other body component
- 0.011% fail on Panel
- 0.022% fail on Bumpers
-
0.011% fail on
Seats
- 0.011% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.0055% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.0055% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.0055% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.0055% fail on Bracket
-
0.19% fail on
Fuel system
(190% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.17% fail on Condition
- 0.0055% fail on Requirements
- 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.011% fail on
Airbags
- 0.011% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.16% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
- 0.033% fail on Condition
-
0.083% fail on
Steering
(79% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.050% fail on
Steering linkage components
(85% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0055% fail on Drag link end
- 0.0055% fail on Steering arm
-
0.017% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.011% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0055% fail on Operation
- 0.011% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.0055% fail on
Steering play
- 0.0055% fail on Steering rack
-
0.050% fail on
Steering linkage components
(85% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.067% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(70% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Registration plates (72% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0055% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
Read the Honest John Review