Skoda Fabia MOT Results
Registered in 200857.5% pass rate
from 13,323 tests in 2021
(3.0% worse than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Skoda Fabia is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Suspension
-
6.9% fail on
Springs
(15% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Coil springs
(16% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Coil spring (16% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.053% fail on Mounting
-
6.9% fail on
Coil springs
(16% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(29% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (94% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (100% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (27% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.023% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.023% fail on Linkage (90% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (87% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0075% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
3.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(29% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes (21% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint (48% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.15% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.038% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings (55% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Shock absorbers (29% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Other suspension component
(48% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.045% fail on Ball joint (70% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.015% fail on Pins and bushes (79% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0075% fail on Other suspension component
-
0.15% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.068% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.038% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.038% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.0075% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (84% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.068% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.045% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.015% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0075% fail on Suspension rod
-
0.038% fail on
Sub-frames
(91% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (86% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0075% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.0075% fail on
Axles
- 0.0075% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
6.9% fail on
Springs
(15% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(7.5% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Stop lamp (72% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.1% fail on
Direction indicators
(48% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Flashing type
(48% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (100% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.21% fail on All direction indicators (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Side repeaters (72% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Switch
-
3.1% fail on
Flashing type
(48% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamps
(18% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp (31% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0075% fail on Dipswitch
- 0.61% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (71% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(34% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(34% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp (34% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(34% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Electrical equipment
(69% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Battery(ies) (65% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.053% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.030% fail on Horn (88% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.13% fail on Position lamp
- 0.0075% fail on Switch
-
0.023% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.015% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.0075% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
0.015% fail on
Reversing lamps
(7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Reversing lamps (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Rear reflectors
-
11% fail on
Brakes
(8.7% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Brake performance
(37% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Service brake performance
(49% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Rbt
(49% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Service brake performance (50% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Service brake imbalance (46% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0075% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.068% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.045% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.023% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.023% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.015% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.0075% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
3.7% fail on
Rbt
(49% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(38% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (43% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (78% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(190% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(190% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.0075% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.0075% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(190% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.015% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.023% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.023% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.015% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0075% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.0075% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.8% fail on
Service brake performance
(49% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(41% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.98% fail on Brake discs
- 0.045% fail on Brake drums (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.92% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(58% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Brake pads (59% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Brake linings
-
0.11% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.053% fail on Lever
- 0.045% fail on Cable
- 0.0075% fail on Brake slack adjuster
-
1.0% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake control
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Pedal
-
0.73% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.68% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.090% fail on Electronic stability control (66% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.59% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.25% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Leaks (18 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.053% fail on Servos (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up (12 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(67% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.038% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.038% fail on Valves (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Servos
- 0.0075% fail on Master cylinder
- 0.083% fail on Rigid brake pipes (94% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Flexible brake hoses (65% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.015% fail on Other components
-
0.0075% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.0075% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
0.0075% fail on
Pressure storage reservoirs
- 0.0075% fail on Air and vacuum systems
-
7.3% fail on
Brake performance
(37% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(32% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Transmission
(66% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(67% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Joints (68% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0075% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.16% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.16% fail on Joints
- 0.015% fail on Belts
-
4.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(67% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Exhaust system (29% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Doors
-
0.26% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.26% fail on Door condition (59% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.17% fail on Door condition
-
0.045% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.045% fail on Door condition
-
0.26% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.16% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.16% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.14% fail on
Fuel system
(49% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.023% fail on System
- 0.015% fail on Hose
- 0.0075% fail on Pipe
-
0.090% fail on
Body
- 0.045% fail on Other body component
- 0.038% fail on Panel
- 0.0075% fail on Body condition
-
0.075% fail on
Chassis
- 0.075% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.075% fail on Bumpers
-
0.075% fail on
Seats
- 0.053% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.023% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.045% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.045% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.045% fail on Undertray
-
0.015% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.015% fail on Bracket
- 0.0075% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
4.5% fail on
Transmission
(66% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Tyres
(16% better than other 2008 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Tread depth (19% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Condition
- 0.19% fail on Size/type
-
5.3% fail on
Visibility
(16% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Washers (13% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Wipers (15% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.11% fail on Windscreen
- 0.0075% fail on Window
-
0.083% fail on
View to rear
(54% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Mirrors (52% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Bonnet (93% better than other 2008 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (35% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.030% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.0075% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0075% fail on Catalytic converter
-
1.9% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.66% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (64% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.57% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.42% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.090% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.030% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.0075% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0075% fail on Other emission control equipment
-
3.3% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.11% fail on
Fluid leaks
(71% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Engine oil leaks (78% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.0075% fail on Other leaks
-
0.015% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.0075% fail on Sound deadening material
- 0.0075% fail on Undertray
-
5.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.9% fail on
Steering
(45% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(59% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Track rod end (68% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Ball joint
- 0.030% fail on Drag link end
- 0.015% fail on Steering arm
- 0.0075% fail on Locking devices
-
0.29% fail on
Steering gear
(36% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Steering rack (36% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0075% fail on Steering box
-
0.28% fail on
Power steering
(56% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Other components (140% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Operation
- 0.053% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.023% fail on Rams
- 0.0075% fail on Pump
-
0.11% fail on
Steering play
- 0.11% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0075% fail on Steering box
- 0.060% fail on Electronic power steering
- 0.0075% fail on Steering column
-
3.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(59% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.77% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.38% fail on Condition
- 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.023% fail on Requirements
- 0.0075% fail on Attachment
- 0.0075% fail on Pre-tensioners
- 0.62% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.030% fail on
Airbags
- 0.023% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.0075% fail on Passengers airbag
-
0.77% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.38% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
- 0.083% fail on Condition
- 0.0075% fail on Hubs
-
0.35% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(34% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Registration plates (35% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0075% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.015% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.015% fail on Speedometer
-
0.0075% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.0075% fail on
Doors
- 0.0075% fail on Emergency exits
-
0.0075% fail on
Doors
-
0.0075% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.0075% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review
-
Skoda Fabia (2007 - 2015)
Decently built and good value. Cheap to run. Greenline models are very economical with low CO2 emissions.