Skoda Citigo MOT Results
Registered in 201890.9% pass rate
from 5,415 tests in 2021
(20% better than other 2018 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2018 cars and highlighted areas where the Skoda Citigo is unusually good or bad.
-
3.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(32% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
(39% worse than other 2018 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (38% worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.0% fail on
Headlamps
(160% worse than other 2018 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.22% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.11% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.11% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.11% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.11% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.11% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.055% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.055% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.055% fail on
Front fog lamps
- 0.055% fail on Front fog lamps
-
0.055% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.055% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.018% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.018% fail on Position lamp
-
0.018% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.018% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.018% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.018% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
(39% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Visibility
- 2.7% fail on Wipers
- 0.87% fail on Washers
-
0.055% fail on
View to rear
- 0.037% fail on Mirrors
- 0.018% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.037% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.037% fail on Windscreen
-
1.4% fail on
Tyres
(57% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Tread depth (47% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Size/type
-
0.79% fail on
Brakes
(43% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Brake performance
(66% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Service brake performance
(120% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Rbt
(120% worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.018% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.37% fail on
Rbt
(120% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.074% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.074% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.39% fail on
Service brake performance
(120% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(85% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.055% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(93% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Brake pads (93% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.055% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.055% fail on Brake discs
-
0.037% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.018% fail on Lever
- 0.018% fail on Brake slack adjuster
-
0.055% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(93% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.055% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.055% fail on Hand lever
-
0.055% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.055% fail on Lever
- 0.018% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.018% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.018% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.018% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.018% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.54% fail on
Brake performance
(66% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.22% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.22% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.20% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.018% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.018% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.22% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.22% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 0.074% fail on Bumpers
-
0.037% fail on
Transmission
-
0.037% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.037% fail on Joints
-
0.037% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.018% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.018% fail on
Body
- 0.018% fail on Other body component
-
0.13% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.074% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.055% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.055% fail on Condition
-
0.11% fail on
Suspension
(69% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.018% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.018% fail on Ball joint
-
0.055% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.037% fail on Condition
- 0.018% fail on Attachment
-
0.037% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(85% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Registration plates (85% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Steering
- 0.018% fail on Electronic power steering
Read the Honest John Review
-
Skoda Citigo (2012 - 2019)
Ideal for town or motorway driving, and economical on fuel. Fun to drive and great value.