MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Skoda » Citigo » 2017

Skoda Citigo MOT Results

Registered in 2017
86.8% pass rate
from 6,337 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Skoda Citigo is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.1% fail on Visibility (92% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Washers
    • 0.063% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.063% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.016% fail on View to rear
      • 0.016% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.99% fail on Headlamps (97% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Headlamp (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.16% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.14% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.11% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.032% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.095% fail on Stop lamp (71% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.047% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.032% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.032% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.016% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.016% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 1.5% fail on Tyres (55% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Tread depth (58% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Size/type
  • 1.0% fail on Brakes (50% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Mechanical brake components (67% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Brake linings and pads (73% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Brake pads (73% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.17% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.44% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.095% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.095% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.016% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.016% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.032% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.032% fail on Rbt
          • 0.016% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.016% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.032% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.032% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.095% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.095% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.047% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.047% fail on Lever
    • 0.016% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.016% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 0.62% fail on Body, chassis, structure (99% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Fuel system (17 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (26 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Tank
    • 0.063% fail on Transmission
      • 0.063% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.047% fail on Joints
        • 0.016% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.016% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.016% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.016% fail on Body
      • 0.016% fail on Other body component
    • 0.016% fail on Doors
      • 0.016% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.016% fail on Door condition
  • 0.28% fail on Suspension (68% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.095% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.079% fail on Suspension arms (66% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.047% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.032% fail on Springs (91% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Coil springs (91% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.032% fail on Coil spring (91% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.016% fail on Linkage ball joints
  • 0.27% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.22% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 0.047% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.27% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (51% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Exhaust emissions (49% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.22% fail on Catalyst emissions (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.016% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.016% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.095% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.063% fail on Attachment
    • 0.032% fail on Condition
  • 0.063% fail on Identification of the vehicle (69% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Registration plates (69% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.016% fail on Steering
    • 0.016% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.016% fail on Track rod end
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages