Skoda Citigo MOT Results
Registered in 201681.7% pass rate
from 7,826 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Skoda Citigo is unusually good or bad.
-
7.2% fail on
Visibility
(81% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Washers
-
0.038% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.038% fail on Windscreen
-
0.026% fail on
View to rear
- 0.026% fail on Mirrors
-
3.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
(57% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (61% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.64% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.60% fail on Headlamp
- 0.051% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.41% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.15% fail on
Direction indicators
(58% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Flashing type
(58% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (54% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.15% fail on
Flashing type
(58% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.12% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.077% fail on Stop lamp (88% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.026% fail on Position lamp
- 0.013% fail on Switch
-
0.038% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.026% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.013% fail on Reversing lamp switch
-
0.038% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.038% fail on Horn
-
0.013% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.013% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
(57% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Brakes
(34% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Brake performance
(72% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(150% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.00% fail on
Rbt
(150% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.013% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.013% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.00% fail on
Rbt
(150% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(160% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(180% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.22% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(180% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.14% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.038% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.038% fail on
Rbt
- 0.038% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.038% fail on
Rbt
- 0.013% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(150% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(71% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Brake pads (79% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Brake linings
-
0.27% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(44% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Brake discs (44% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.013% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.013% fail on Lever
-
0.35% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.15% fail on Lever
-
0.064% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.051% fail on Hand lever
- 0.013% fail on Pedal
-
0.038% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.026% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.013% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.026% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.013% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.013% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.013% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.3% fail on
Brake performance
(72% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Tyres
(55% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.00% fail on Tread depth (48% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Size/type
-
1.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(160% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Fuel system
(30 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (37 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Tank (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.077% fail on Bumpers
- 0.051% fail on Exhaust system (68% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.013% fail on
Transmission
-
0.013% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.013% fail on Joints
-
0.013% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.013% fail on
Body
- 0.013% fail on Panel
-
0.013% fail on
Seats
- 0.013% fail on Driver's seat
-
1.3% fail on
Fuel system
(30 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(69% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(76% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Spark ignition
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.077% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.026% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.013% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.013% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.013% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.013% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.013% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Spark ignition
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(76% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Suspension
(79% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Suspension arms
(53% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.089% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.051% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.051% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(75% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.013% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.013% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
0.026% fail on
Springs
(98% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.026% fail on
Coil springs
(98% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Coil spring (98% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.026% fail on
Coil springs
(98% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Suspension arms
(53% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.14% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.14% fail on Condition
- 0.026% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (79% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.089% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.064% fail on Attachment
- 0.026% fail on Condition
-
0.077% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(64% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.077% fail on Registration plates (64% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.051% fail on
Steering
(81% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Steering linkage components
(82% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Track rod end (81% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.013% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.013% fail on Steering rack
-
0.038% fail on
Steering linkage components
(82% better than other 2016 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Skoda Citigo (2012 - 2019)
Ideal for town or motorway driving, and economical on fuel. Fun to drive and great value.