Skoda Citigo MOT Results

Registered in 2016
88.0% pass rate
from 8,025 tests in 2020
(10% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Skoda Citigo is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (78% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (93% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim (95% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.9% fail on Position lamps (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Position lamp (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on All position lamps (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.37% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.36% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.012% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.19% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.19% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.14% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.050% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.12% fail on Stop lamp (68% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.100% fail on Daytime running lamps (27 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.100% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.100% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.100% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.050% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.037% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.012% fail on Reversing lamp switch
  • 2.2% fail on Visibility (22% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Wipers (47% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Washers
    • 0.12% fail on View to rear (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Mirrors (200% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.100% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.062% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.062% fail on Windscreen
  • 1.3% fail on Tyres (64% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Tread depth (60% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Condition (68% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Size/type
    • 0.025% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 0.98% fail on Brakes (51% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.34% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.34% fail on Rbt
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.075% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.037% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.037% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.025% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.012% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.012% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.012% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.30% fail on Mechanical brake components (79% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.16% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.15% fail on Brake linings and pads (88% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Brake pads (88% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Parking brake control (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Lever (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.100% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.100% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.012% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.012% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.012% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.012% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.012% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.012% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 0.90% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Fuel system (27 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (41 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.037% fail on Body
      • 0.025% fail on Other body component
      • 0.012% fail on Panel
    • 0.025% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.012% fail on Towbar
      • 0.012% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.012% fail on Seats
      • 0.012% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 0.26% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.17% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 0.087% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.25% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.24% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.24% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.19% fail on Catalyst emissions (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.012% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.012% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.012% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.19% fail on Suspension (70% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.075% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.012% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.012% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.012% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.012% fail on Linkage ball joints
  • 0.075% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.062% fail on Condition
    • 0.012% fail on Attachment
  • 0.037% fail on Identification of the vehicle (84% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.037% fail on Registration plates (84% better than other 2016 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Skoda Citigo (2012 - 2019)
    Small car based on Volkswagen Up. Ideal for town. Economical on fuel. Fun to drive. Lower prices than Up and SEAT Mii.

    Search Good Garages