SEAT Toledo MOT Results

Registered in 2015
78.5% pass rate
from 1,040 tests in 2020
(34% worse than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Toledo is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (64% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (74% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (73% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.96% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.38% fail on Headlamp levelling device (20 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (150% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.77% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.19% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.19% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.19% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.19% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.19% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.096% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.096% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.096% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.096% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 5.5% fail on Suspension (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (19 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Linkage ball joints (20 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (34 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes (39 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover (14 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.096% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.096% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.29% fail on Macpherson strut (14 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.096% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.096% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.096% fail on Springs
      • 0.096% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.096% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.096% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.096% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.096% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.096% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.096% fail on Size/type
  • 4.0% fail on Brakes (50% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.67% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.67% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.096% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.096% fail on Lever
    • 0.87% fail on Parking brake control (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Lever (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.38% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.38% fail on Rbt
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.29% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt
          • 0.096% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.096% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.096% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.096% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.096% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.29% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (15 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (18 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.19% fail on Anti-lock braking system (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.096% fail on Valves
    • 0.096% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.096% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 3.6% fail on Visibility
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.58% fail on Washers
    • 0.48% fail on Driver's view (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  • 2.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.87% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.096% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.096% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.096% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.096% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.096% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.2% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.096% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 2.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Transmission (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Drive shafts (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Joints (11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.096% fail on Joints
    • 0.096% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.096% fail on Body
      • 0.096% fail on Panel
    • 0.096% fail on Seats
      • 0.096% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.096% fail on Undertray
  • 0.58% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.48% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.096% fail on Requirements
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.096% fail on Attachment
  • 0.19% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.19% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

  • SEAT Toledo (2012 - 2018)
    Looks like a conventional saloon but is actually a hatchback. Huge boot space. Good quality and impressively spacious interior. Great value for money and an ideal family car.

    Search Good Garages