MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » SEAT » Toledo » 2014

SEAT Toledo MOT Results

Registered in 2014
80.8% pass rate
from 1,167 tests in 2017
(35% worse than other 2014 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2014 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Toledo is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.9% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (95% worse than other 2014 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim (110% worse than other 2014 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (190% worse than other 2014 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 2014 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Front lamps (170% worse than other 2014 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Rear lamps (7 times worse than other 2014 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.86% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.77% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.26% fail on Battery (10 times worse than other 2014 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.17% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.086% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.17% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.17% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.17% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.086% fail on Horn
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Condition (72% worse than other 2014 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.26% fail on Size/type (3 times worse than other 2014 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (81% better than other 2014 cars)
  • 3.3% fail on Suspension (2 times worse than other 2014 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers (5 times worse than other 2014 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2014 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Anti-roll bars (12 times worse than other 2014 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (14 times worse than other 2014 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (17 times worse than other 2014 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2014 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Front drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2014 cars)
        • 0.69% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other 2014 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.086% fail on Attachment
    • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut (7 times worse than other 2014 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2014 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.086% fail on Front
      • 0.086% fail on Rear
    • 0.086% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.086% fail on Condition
    • 0.086% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.086% fail on Suspension unit
  • 3.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 1.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.86% fail on Washers
    • 0.60% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.086% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.086% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.3% fail on Brakes
    • 1.5% fail on Hub components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.17% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.17% fail on Brake calipers (10 times worse than other 2014 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.34% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.086% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.086% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.17% fail on Components
        • 0.086% fail on Hoses
        • 0.086% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.086% fail on Leaks
    • 0.086% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.086% fail on Condition
    • 0.086% fail on ABS
    • 0.086% fail on Restricted movement
  • 0.51% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.26% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.17% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.086% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.26% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
  • 0.17% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.086% fail on Body condition
    • 0.086% fail on Load security
      • 0.086% fail on Bootlid
  • 0.086% fail on Steering
    • 0.086% fail on Steering system
      • 0.086% fail on Free play
        • 0.086% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.086% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.086% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.086% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.086% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

  • SEAT Toledo (2012 - 2018)
    Looks like a conventional saloon but is actually a hatchback. Huge boot space. Good quality and impressively spacious interior. Great value for money and an ideal family car.

    Search Good Garages