SEAT Toledo MOT Results
Registered in 201368.7% pass rate
from 1,305 tests in 2021
(14% worse than other 2013 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2013 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Toledo is unusually good or bad.
-
9.6% fail on
Suspension
(30% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Springs
-
3.6% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.6% fail on Coil spring
-
3.6% fail on
Coil springs
-
3.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 1.00% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.077% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.077% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.077% fail on Linkage
-
3.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes (150% worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Ball joint
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.69% fail on
Macpherson strut
(8 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.077% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.54% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.077% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.077% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.077% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
3.6% fail on
Springs
-
8.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp
- 0.31% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.69% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.38% fail on
Position lamps
(6 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Position lamp (6 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.38% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.15% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.15% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.077% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.38% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.38% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.38% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.31% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.31% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.31% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.31% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.23% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.15% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.077% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.077% fail on Horn
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamps
-
8.0% fail on
Brakes
(57% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(68% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.5% fail on Brake pads
-
2.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(150% worse than other 2013 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Brake discs (150% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Lever (14 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
3.9% fail on
Brake performance
(91% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(160% worse than other 2013 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
-
0.92% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.92% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.92% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.69% fail on
Rbt
- 0.61% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.077% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.077% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.077% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.69% fail on
Rbt
- 0.077% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(160% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(4 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (6 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.15% fail on Pedal
- 0.077% fail on Hand lever
-
0.15% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.15% fail on Lever
- 0.15% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.15% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.077% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.077% fail on Electronic stability control
-
4.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(68% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Transmission
(4 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(4 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.077% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.077% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.23% fail on
Prop shafts
(5 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Joints (7 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(4 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Exhaust system (180% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(56 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (75 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.077% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.077% fail on Pipe
- 0.077% fail on Bumpers
-
0.077% fail on
Doors
-
0.077% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.077% fail on Door condition
-
0.077% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.077% fail on Undertray
-
4.3% fail on
Transmission
(4 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
- 2.5% fail on Condition
- 0.31% fail on Size/type
-
4.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(130% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(130% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Compression ignition
(3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.31% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.31% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.077% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.077% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.6% fail on
Compression ignition
(3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.15% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
3.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(130% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Visibility
- 1.5% fail on Wipers
- 1.4% fail on Washers
-
0.54% fail on
Condition of glass
(6 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Windscreen (7 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.077% fail on
View to rear
- 0.077% fail on Mirrors
-
1.8% fail on
Steering
-
0.84% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.61% fail on Track rod end
- 0.15% fail on Drag link end (11 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.077% fail on Ball joint
-
0.69% fail on
Steering gear
(7 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Steering play
(13 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Steering rack (14 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.077% fail on
Power steering
- 0.077% fail on Rams
-
0.84% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.69% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.38% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.31% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.23% fail on Condition
- 0.077% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.38% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.38% fail on Registration plates
-
0.15% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
SEAT Toledo (2012 - 2018)
Looks like a saloon, but is actually a hatchback with a huge boot. Good quality. Spacious interior.