SEAT Toledo MOT Results
Registered in 200648.1% pass rate
from 360 tests in 2021
(22% worse than other 2006 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Toledo is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Suspension
(36% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
10% fail on
Springs
(96% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Coil springs
(92% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 9.7% fail on Coil spring (93% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
9.7% fail on
Coil springs
(92% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.83% fail on Ball joint
-
6.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.7% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.83% fail on Ball joint
- 0.83% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.8% fail on Shock absorbers (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.56% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.28% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.28% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.28% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
10% fail on
Springs
(96% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
8.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
4.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
- 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
-
2.5% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
- 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
- 0.56% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.28% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.28% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.28% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.28% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
3.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.1% fail on Brake pads
-
0.83% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.83% fail on Brake discs
-
0.28% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.28% fail on Cable
-
3.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.9% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 1.1% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.56% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.56% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.56% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.28% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.28% fail on Servos
-
0.28% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.28% fail on Lever
-
0.28% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.28% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.28% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
8.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp
- 0.28% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.7% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.1% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Horn
-
1.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.28% fail on
Front fog lamps
- 0.28% fail on Front fog lamps
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Position lamps
(5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Position lamp (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.28% fail on All position lamps
-
1.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.28% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.28% fail on Switch
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(64% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Transmission
(170% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(140% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Joints (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Prop shafts
(7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Joints (12 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(140% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.83% fail on
Body
- 0.83% fail on Panel (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Doors
-
0.83% fail on
Front passenger's door
(5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Door condition (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Front passenger's door
(5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Bumpers
-
0.28% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.28% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.28% fail on Undertray
-
8.9% fail on
Transmission
(170% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
11% fail on
Tyres
(59% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Condition (83% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Tread depth
- 0.56% fail on Size/type
-
8.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
8.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.7% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.28% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested
-
4.7% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(200% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 7.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Visibility
- 3.9% fail on Washers
- 3.1% fail on Wipers
-
0.56% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.56% fail on Windscreen
-
0.28% fail on
View to rear
- 0.28% fail on Mirrors
-
1.1% fail on
Steering
-
0.83% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.56% fail on Track rod end
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint
- 0.28% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.83% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.56% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.56% fail on Registration plates
-
0.28% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.28% fail on
Doors
- 0.28% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
-
0.28% fail on
Doors
Read the Honest John Review
-
SEAT Toledo (2005 - 2009)
Roomy, well-equipped cabin and a large, practical boot.