SEAT Toledo MOT Results
Registered in 200552.6% pass rate
from 894 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Toledo is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Suspension
(37% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 11% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
10% fail on
Drive shafts
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
10% fail on
Front drive shafts
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 10% fail on Constant velocity joints (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
10% fail on
Front drive shafts
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(82% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (90% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.34% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Linkage condition
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(41% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.56% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.45% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.45% fail on Condition
-
0.34% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.34% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.11% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
0.11% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.11% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
19% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(18% better than other 2005 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.4% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.7% fail on Rear lamps (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Front lamps (84% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (50% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.34% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.34% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Fog lamp (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Tell tale (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamps
(56% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp (54% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Battery
- 0.67% fail on Horn
- 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
14% fail on
Tyres
(57% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Tread depth (41% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Condition (85% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Size/type
- 0.22% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
7.4% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.3% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.1% fail on Front wheels
- 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (59% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.4% fail on
Hub components
(55% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Brake pads (59% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Brake discs
- 0.34% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.11% fail on Brake linings
- 0.11% fail on Brake back plates
-
1.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(62% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Components
(71% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Hoses
- 0.34% fail on Pipes (88% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Leaks
- 0.11% fail on Operation
-
1.0% fail on
Components
(71% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.89% fail on ABS
- 0.67% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.56% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.22% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.22% fail on Condition
-
7.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.7% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.6% fail on Wipers
- 3.1% fail on Washers
- 0.45% fail on Windscreen
-
5.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Drivers airbag (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Passengers airbag
-
0.11% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
5.1% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 2.5% fail on Emissions
- 1.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.56% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.34% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.22% fail on System
- 0.11% fail on Cap
-
1.3% fail on
Steering
(67% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Steering system
(81% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Track rod end (86% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Steering rack
- 0.11% fail on Steering arm
-
0.56% fail on
Power steering
- 0.45% fail on Electronic power steering (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Operation
- 0.11% fail on Locking devices
-
0.67% fail on
Steering system
(81% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.56% fail on
Doors
- 0.45% fail on Passengers other
- 0.11% fail on Passengers front
- 0.11% fail on Body condition
-
0.11% fail on
Load security
- 0.11% fail on Tailgate
-
0.56% fail on
Doors
-
0.56% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.56% fail on Registration plate
-
0.34% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.22% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
SEAT Toledo (2005 - 2009)
Roomy, well-equipped cabin and a large, practical boot.