SEAT Toledo MOT Results
Registered in 200552.8% pass rate
from 472 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Toledo is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Suspension
-
9.5% fail on
Springs
(100% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Coil springs
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 9.5% fail on Coil spring (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Coil springs
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint
- 0.85% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
3.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.2% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.42% fail on Ball joint (82% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.85% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.42% fail on Ball joint
- 0.21% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.64% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.42% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 0.21% fail on Shock absorbers
-
9.5% fail on
Springs
(100% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.64% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamps
(63% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp (62% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.21% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.85% fail on
Position lamps
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Position lamp (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.64% fail on
Hazard warning
(6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.64% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.21% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.21% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
13% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(98% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
13% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Spark ignition
- 5.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (98% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
-
6.6% fail on
Compression ignition
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.21% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.21% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
6.8% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.21% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.21% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
13% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
8.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.9% fail on
Rbt
- 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
4.9% fail on
Rbt
-
4.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.21% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
- 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.21% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.21% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
- 0.64% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.64% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.42% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.42% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.21% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.42% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.0% fail on Brake pads
-
2.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 2.3% fail on Brake discs
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.21% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.64% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.64% fail on Lever
- 0.64% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.42% fail on Rigid brake pipes (85% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.21% fail on Pedal
-
0.21% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.21% fail on Servos
-
8.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
10% fail on
Transmission
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 9.5% fail on Joints (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.64% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.85% fail on
Body
- 0.42% fail on Panel
- 0.42% fail on Other body component
-
0.21% fail on
Chassis
- 0.21% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.21% fail on
Doors
-
0.21% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.21% fail on Door condition
-
0.21% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
10% fail on
Transmission
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Tyres
- 5.3% fail on Condition (81% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.21% fail on Size/type
-
7.4% fail on
Visibility
- 4.7% fail on Washers
- 3.2% fail on Wipers
-
0.21% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.21% fail on Windscreen
-
6.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Airbags
(7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Drivers airbag (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.21% fail on Requirements
- 0.21% fail on Condition
-
1.7% fail on
Steering
(57% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.85% fail on Steering rack
-
0.64% fail on
Steering linkage components
(78% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Track rod end (84% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Drag link end
- 0.21% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.85% fail on
Steering gear
-
0.42% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.42% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
SEAT Toledo (2005 - 2009)
Roomy, well-equipped cabin and a large, practical boot.