MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » SEAT » Toledo » 2005

SEAT Toledo MOT Results

Registered in 2005
52.6% pass rate
from 894 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Toledo is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension (37% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 11% fail on Coil springs (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 11% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 10% fail on Drive shafts (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 10% fail on Front drive shafts (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 10% fail on Constant velocity joints (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (82% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (90% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.34% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.6% fail on Suspension arms (41% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.56% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.45% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.34% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (18% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Rear lamps (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Front lamps (84% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (50% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.34% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.34% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Fog lamp (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Tell tale (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (56% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp (54% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Battery
    • 0.67% fail on Horn
    • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 14% fail on Tyres (57% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Tread depth (41% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Condition (85% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Size/type
    • 0.22% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 7.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (59% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.4% fail on Hub components (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Brake pads (59% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.34% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.11% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.11% fail on Brake back plates
    • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic systems (62% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Components (71% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Hoses
        • 0.34% fail on Pipes (88% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
    • 0.89% fail on ABS
    • 0.67% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.56% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.22% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
  • 6.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.45% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Drivers airbag (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers airbag
    • 0.11% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
  • 4.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.5% fail on Emissions
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.56% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.34% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on System
      • 0.11% fail on Cap
  • 1.3% fail on Steering (67% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Steering system (81% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Track rod end (86% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.11% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.56% fail on Power steering
      • 0.45% fail on Electronic power steering (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
    • 0.11% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.78% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.56% fail on Doors
      • 0.45% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.11% fail on Body condition
    • 0.11% fail on Load security
      • 0.11% fail on Tailgate
  • 0.56% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.56% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.34% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages