SEAT Toledo MOT Results

Registered in 2003
51.6% pass rate
from 426 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Toledo is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.23% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.23% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.23% fail on Switch
    • 0.23% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.23% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.23% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 13% fail on Suspension (28% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.23% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.23% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 5.2% fail on Springs
      • 5.2% fail on Coil springs
        • 4.9% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.23% fail on Mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.47% fail on Anti-roll bars (92% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage
    • 0.23% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 6.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.47% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.47% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.47% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.47% fail on Lever (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (66% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.70% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.70% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.47% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.47% fail on Lever
    • 0.47% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.23% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.23% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.23% fail on Other components
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.1% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Other passenger's door (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Catch
      • 0.70% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.70% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.23% fail on Door condition
    • 2.8% fail on Transmission
      • 2.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.8% fail on Joints
    • 0.47% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.47% fail on Boot lid (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Boot lid condition (11 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Undertray (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.23% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.23% fail on Seats
      • 0.23% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 9.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 9.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 3.5% fail on Compression ignition (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.23% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.47% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.47% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 8.9% fail on Steering (81% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Steering linkage components (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Track rod end (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.94% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.94% fail on Steering rack
  • 7.7% fail on Tyres
    • 7.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
  • 5.2% fail on Visibility
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.47% fail on View to rear
      • 0.47% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.23% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.23% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.47% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.23% fail on Requirements
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
  • 0.47% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.47% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages