SEAT Toledo MOT Results
Registered in 199946.8% pass rate
from 186 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Toledo is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 8.1% fail on Stop lamp
- 7.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
6.5% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.9% fail on Front lamps
- 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp
-
3.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.7% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.54% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.6% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.54% fail on Tell tale
- 0.54% fail on Battery
- 0.54% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.54% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.54% fail on Switch
-
20% fail on
Brakes
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
- 8.6% fail on Rear wheels (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance
- 1.1% fail on Front wheels
-
8.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
7.5% fail on
Components
- 4.8% fail on Pipes
- 2.7% fail on Hoses
- 0.54% fail on Operation
-
7.5% fail on
Components
-
2.2% fail on
Hub components
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
- 1.1% fail on ABS
-
0.54% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.54% fail on Condition
-
0.54% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.54% fail on
Pedal
- 0.54% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.54% fail on
Pedal
- 0.54% fail on Restricted movement
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
-
16% fail on
Suspension
-
5.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.54% fail on Attachment
-
3.8% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 3.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
3.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
3.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
2.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.2% fail on Condition
-
1.6% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.1% fail on Front
- 0.54% fail on Rear
-
1.1% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
0.54% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.54% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.54% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.54% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.54% fail on Front suspension joints
-
5.4% fail on
Suspension arms
-
12% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.5% fail on Emissions
- 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.1% fail on Cap
-
11% fail on
Tyres
- 7.0% fail on Tread depth
- 3.8% fail on Condition
- 0.54% fail on Size/type
-
8.6% fail on
Steering
-
8.6% fail on
Steering system
(120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Track rod end (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Steering rack
-
0.54% fail on
Free play
- 0.54% fail on Steering rack
- 0.54% fail on Drag link end
-
8.6% fail on
Steering system
(120% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.6% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.4% fail on Wipers
- 2.2% fail on Washers
- 1.6% fail on Windscreen
-
6.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.2% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 3.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
3.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
-
3.2% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
4.8% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
2.7% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Passengers front (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Passengers other
- 0.54% fail on Drivers
-
1.6% fail on
Seats
(4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Passengers (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Drivers
-
1.1% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.1% fail on Chassis
-
2.7% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate
-
0.54% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.54% fail on Attachment